From the video

Video: He's The Backup
a little bit too much value tied into with Travis Kelce. Like I think where you took those guys again, I don't know exactly what round it was in, but my best guess would have been that I'd probably prefer instead to see us take a running back or a wide receiver in those rounds. But as it stands now, like I don't expect that you're going to be able to sell Kelsey.

STACKED’s take

Negative signalValue

Overvalued at draft position; difficult to trade but hold required

Too much draft capital invested at his draft position; the source believes 'a little bit too much value tied into with Travis Kelce' and would have preferred a running back or wide receiver in those rounds instead. Does not expect Kelce to be tradeable, though a two-for-one deal could create roster flexibility.

Travis Kelce headshotTravis KelceTE · KCPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight