From the video

Video: Not Him
if you go ahead and you sell Chris Lave for another running back, then cool. All that means is you moved your running back problem to now be a wide receiver problem.

STACKED’s take

NeutralValue

Trade asset but selling creates WR depth problem; no net gain.

Potential trade asset to address RB2 weakness, but selling him would simply shift the roster problem from RB2 to wide receiver depth. Nico Collins notes the team lacks expendable value elsewhere, so trading Lave for a running back upgrade would create a new weakness at receiver.

Chris Olave headshotChris OlaveWR · NOPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight