Source + player page
Fantasy Football Today fantasy football takes on Jonathan Taylor
Every source-backed podcast insight STACKED has extracted from Fantasy Football Today about Jonathan Taylor.
14
Insights
9
Positive
3
Negative
Insight ledger
All Fantasy Football Today insights about Jonathan Taylor
NegativeProjectionJul 31, 2026
The source compares Chase Brown's PPR upside to Jonathan Taylor, noting that Chase Brown has shown more PPR upside than Taylor, though Taylor is likely more steady and talented overall.NegativeBustJul 31, 2026
Taylor is cited as part of a cohort of running backs with high-touch, high-yard seasons facing regression risk. Cook led the league in rushing yards but was less than 40 yards better than Taylor, and the source groups all three (Cook, Henry, Taylor) as players who "all had a lot of touches and they all had a lot of yards" and "could regress." The source expresses concern about drafting these younger backs ahead of McCaffrey given the historical precedent of rushing leaders declining the following season.PositiveValueJul 24, 2026
Jamie Eisenberg selected Jonathan Taylor seventh overall and followed with Ken Walker in the second round to test a running-back-heavy start in a three-wide-receiver league; Jamie was thrilled with the first three picks (Taylor, Walker, and Emeka Abuka) and noted the strategy worked out well.PositiveProjectionJul 22, 2026
Taylor finished top five in PPR points per game in 2024 and is one of the five backs (McCaffrey, Bijon, Gibbs, Taylor, Achane) in that tier. Dave Richard says Taylor is the one he'd bank on to repeat top-five production, expressing confidence in his ability to overcome the 70% regression rate.NegativeRoleJul 22, 2026
James Boyd of The Athletic reports that Jonathan Taylor could be a training camp holdout. Dave Richard and Jamie Eisenberg express concern about this possibility, with Richard noting that Taylor has significant leverage as one of the top five players in terms of having leverage for wanting more money. The hosts acknowledge that if a holdout occurs, it will negatively impact Taylor's fantasy value unless it lasts only a week.NegativeRoleJul 21, 2026
Taylor is cited as an example of a recent holdout/hold-in player who experienced slow starts or injury struggles. Turner acknowledges the correlation between holdouts and performance issues is natural, though he hasn't done a deep dive into the specific data.PositiveValueJul 17, 2026
Jonathan Taylor is mentioned as part of tier two running backs alongside Christian McCaffrey and James Cook for salary cap allocation purposes.PositiveProjectionJul 14, 2026
Jonathan Taylor was the number one running back per game in non-PPR and number two per game in half-PPR last year, with projections showing he is 2.5 points higher per game than James Cook this year.PositiveUsageJul 13, 2026
The Colts want to reduce Jonathan Taylor's workload to keep him fresh, though he would still be first or top three most likely to lead the NFL in carries.NegativeProjectionJul 9, 2026
Jonathan Taylor went fifth overall in round one, but Jake Seeley dislikes this pick because Taylor's performance is heavily dependent on game script—he averaged 30 PPR points per game in Colts wins but only 10 in losses, creating a 20-point gap that suggests he should go later in the first round.PositiveProjectionJun 23, 2026
Taylor had a monster year last year and could potentially crack the top 5, though it would require removing one of the current top 5 (Gibbs, Bijan, Chase, Puka, JSN).PositiveRoleMay 28, 2026
Despite concerns about the Colts' offensive regression, Jonathan Taylor's role as a key player remains intact, and he has the potential to lead the league in rushing if healthy.PositiveRoleMay 28, 2026
Jonathan Taylor has only had two standout seasons in six years, raising concerns about his consistency and performance.PositiveValueMay 15, 2026
Jonathan Taylor is projected to perform at a high level, especially with the potential for increased receptions in the absence of Michael Pittman.