From the episode
I wouldn't mind trying to sell Josh Jacobs cause I'm thinking about it. Like I know they're only what I say 19th or 22nd in points per game, but I feel like they can be a lot better. Um, they got a lot of talent and, um, you know, that starting running back who was, he's been a stud when he's been healthy the last couple of years, but three years ago, he held out and he's awful.
STACKED’s take
Negative signalValue
Source suggests selling Jacobs due to weak Packers run game and touchdown-dependent value.
The source suggests considering selling Jacobs despite the Packers' potential to improve their offense. While the Packers rank 19th-22nd in points per game and have talent, Jacobs' value is constrained by the weak ground game (29th in RB carries per game, 32nd in yards per carry, 27th in RB touchdowns per game) and his receiving role dependency. His receiving value is limited since receiving has never been a big part of his fantasy profile. The source notes his value is mostly touchdown-dependent, making him a sell candidate depending on league-mate valuation.
Josh JacobsRB · GBPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insightMore on Josh Jacobs and from Fantasy Football Today
Fantasy Football Today
RotoWire NFL Articles
RotoWire NFL Articles
Yahoo Sports NFL
NBC Sports Rotoworld
Yahoo Sports NFL
