Drafted reluctantly at pick 178; Mattek doubts his value as a pick.
T.J. HockensonTEMIN
Mattek initially passed on Hockenson in favor of Dalton Schultz to avoid bye week clustering (already missing three players in week 6). Later drafted Hockenson at pick 178, approximately 10 spots after ADP, but Mattek expressed significant doubt: 'I honestly didn't really feel that good about that. I just straight up like think T.J. Hockenson's not a very good pick.' The selection was driven by bye week construction constraints rather than conviction in Hockenson's value.
View T.J. Hockenson 2026 fantasy football value pagePlayer profile with fantasy value, ADP, projections, news, and source-backed STACKED insightsSource transcript excerpt
instead of taking T.J. Hockenson for the stack, because I'm already going to be missing three players in week six... I just straight up like think T.J. Hockenson's not a very good pick.
Common questions
T.J. Hockenson fantasy football FAQ
- What did Davis Mattek say about T.J. Hockenson?
- Mattek initially passed on Hockenson in favor of Dalton Schultz to avoid bye week clustering (already missing three players in week 6). Later drafted Hockenson at pick 178, approximately 10 spots after ADP, but Mattek expressed significant doubt: 'I honestly didn't really feel that good about that. I just straight up like think T.J. Hockenson's not a very good pick.' The selection was driven by bye week construction constraints rather than conviction in Hockenson's value.
- Is this good or bad for T.J. Hockenson's fantasy football value?
- STACKED tags this as a negative fantasy football signal for T.J. Hockenson (TE MIN). Drafted reluctantly at pick 178; Mattek doubts his value as a pick.
- Where can I see T.J. Hockenson's full 2026 fantasy outlook, projections, and ADP?
- T.J. Hockenson's complete 2026 fantasy football outlook — projections, ADP movement across every platform, injury context, and all source-backed STACKED insights — is on their STACKED player profile.
Related signal