Davis Mattek artwork

Nothing Predicts Best Ball Winning Like ADP Value

STACKED extracted the fantasy-relevant player signal from this video and kept the full transcript here for context.

32 min
Duration
Estimated from transcript
Jul 11, 2026
Published
Sat, July 11, 2026
49
Player insights
48
Players mentioned
Topics
Brian Thomas Jr.Alec PierceAmari CooperBrevin JordanBrock BowersBryce YoungCam WardCarnell TateCharlie KolarChris OlaveChristian WatsonD'Andre SwiftDalton SchultzDarren Waller
Player analysis

Player insights

49

Alec Pierce

NegativeValue12:12

Davis Mattek considered whether to buy the discount on Alec Pierce or shore up the running back position at a draft decision point. Pierce was presented as a value option but ultimately passed over in favor of addressing running back depth with Rico Dowdle.

Insight page

Amari Cooper

NegativeValue2:27

Drafted as part of a popular combo strategy with Justin Jefferson to test ADP value accumulation in best ball. Davis Mattek acknowledges this is a very popular pairing in best ball mania but prioritizes projected points and ADP value over uniqueness. Cooper is also drafted as part of Mattek's final roster alongside Hanifan.

Insight page

Brevin Jordan

NegativeProjection10:03

Brevin Jordan is a Jaguars tight end projected for only 85 targets by Mike Clay, significantly behind Travis Hunter's 68 targets. Davis Mattek uses this conservative projection as an example of responsible math-based drafting for the Jaguars offense, suggesting that high-level simulators and projection systems will be conservative on the Jaguars rather than taking strong stances on individual players.

Insight page

Brian Thomas Jr.

PositiveBreakout8:47

Bryan Thomas Jr. is one of the most interesting players in the entire player pool. He was not as bad last year as remembered, with notable games including four catches for 66 yards and a touchdown against Seattle, four for 66 and a touchdown against the Jets, and three for 87 against Indianapolis. In 2024, he posted WR9, WR9, WR4, WR3, and WR12 finishes while playing with Mac Jones, suggesting potential for improvement with better quarterback play or situation clarity. Ranked wide receiver 40 in Mike Clay's target projections with 102 targets; Davis Mattek holds 11% exposure in best ball portfolio because he's cheap and part of a high-upside Jaguars offense with a very high win total.

Insight page
PositiveMatchup14:14

Davis Mattek identifies Brian Thomas Jr. as a potential chalk pairing with Trevor Lawrence that could dominate weeks 15–16 in best ball. Mattek suggests this combination could be the winning stack to reach the finals, regardless of ownership levels. Mattek also drafted Thomas as part of his best ball wide receiver group alongside Justin Jefferson, Ladd McConkey, Jakobi Meyers, Stefon Diggs, Trey Tucker, and Jerry Jeudy.

Insight page

Brock Bowers

PositiveProjection20:39

Was a huge bust in the previous year's Best Ball Mania data, but the source still plans to draft him sometimes despite the historical bust profile, indicating the source believes in his talent despite past performance.

Insight page

Bryce Young

PositiveValue24:51

Bryce Young was still on the board at pick 178 and represented significant value in Davis Mattek's best ball draft. Mattek stated 'If Bryce Young does not go, that is who I'm going to take. I'm going to take Bryce Young' and noted the potential for a last-round stack with him. However, Young was selected before Mattek's pick, so Mattek did not ultimately draft him.

Insight page

Cam Ward

PositiveValue13:19

Davis Mattek considers Cam Ward as a potential uncommon stack option for a second quarterback pairing with Chigoziem Okonkwo as a back stack. This is presented as a way to differentiate from chalk pairings and create a unique combination in the draft.

Insight page

Carnell Tate

NegativeValue7:18

Carnell Tate goes ahead of average draft position in this draft scenario, indicating he's being selected earlier than his expected ADP.

Insight page

Charlie Kolar

NegativeRole6:30

Positioned as the Durham Smythe comparable in the Chargers offense under Mike McDaniel, referencing the 2023 Dolphins' fullback role; this suggests limited fantasy production despite being on the roster.

Insight page

Chris Olave

PositiveValue5:23

Chris Olave is presented as a superior value alternative to Ladd McConkey at pick 34. Davis Mattek suggests that getting Olave falling five spots after ADP would be better value than taking McConkey at 34, implying Olave's ADP fall represents a buying opportunity.

Insight page

Christian Watson

NegativeValue7:18

Christian Watson was drafted at pick 49, ahead of his average draft position, indicating he's being selected earlier than expected.

Insight page

D'Andre Swift

NegativeValue7:30

De'Andre Swift is available at pick 50 and represents a clear ADP value decision point in this draft; the source is comfortable taking him or Treylon Henderson at this juncture.

Insight page

Dalton Schultz

PositiveValue22:18

Selected as a reach at tight end with a week 8 bye (unique on the source's roster). The source argues Schultz is underrated by the market because he is 'not very sexy.' Last year Schultz posted 10.4 points per game with 1.56 yards per route run and a higher target share than Hunter Henry (10.5 PPG, 1.73 YPRR). The source explicitly states 'I think he's a better pick than Hunter Henry' because Schultz is younger, doesn't play with A.J. Brown (unlike Henry), and the Texans offense could improve with C.J. Stroud returning to rookie form. The source has very little Dalton Schultz exposure and is correcting that.

Insight page

Darren Waller

NegativeDepth Chart18:15

The source mentions Shakir as a player to avoid due to a week seven bye, indicating bye week management is a key draft consideration.

Insight page

David Njoku

NegativeRole6:30

Projected to barely do anything in the Chargers offense under Mike McDaniel, consistent with Davis Mattek's analysis that tertiary players in McDaniel's system are limited despite overall offensive success.

Insight page

Deebo Samuel

PositiveValue20:26

Identified as a closing-line ADP value opportunity, representing potential post-draft ADP movement that could provide value.

Insight page

Deshaun Watson

NegativeProjection30:01

Deshaun Watson ranks among the seven worst quarterbacks in the NFL by adjusted EPA per play over the last five years, alongside Bailey Zappe, P.J. Walker, Tommy DeVito, Zach Wilson, and Trey Lance. Davis Mattek's quant model projects 2,000 passing yards and eight passing touchdowns, but Mattek emphasizes 'It's not like it's a good situation. It's not like you want to take Deshaun Watson.' Despite this, Mattek selected Watson as a late-round value at pick 207 in best ball, comparing him favorably to Aaron Rodgers at pick 162 as a closing-line value play, though Mattek acknowledges it was not one of his proudest draft moments.

Insight page

DeVonta Smith

PositiveValue5:23

Presented as a superior value alternative to Ladd McConkey at pick 34; Davis Mattek suggests that getting DeVonta Smith falling five spots after ADP would be better value than taking McConkey at 34, implying Smith's ADP fall represents a buying opportunity in best ball.

Insight page

Eli Stowers

PositiveValue29:18

Davis Mattek continues to be higher than the market on Eli Stowers, selecting him as his third tight end in best ball. Mattek reasons that the Philadelphia Eagles' aggressive offensive scheme and the fact they drafted Stowers makes it unlikely they would turn the team over to Grant Calcaterra, suggesting Stowers has more upside than his ADP reflects. Mattek's conviction is based on the Eagles' aggressive play style and their draft investment in Stowers.

Insight page

Grant Calcaterra

NegativeRole30:25

Davis Mattek expresses skepticism that the Philadelphia Eagles would turn their offense over to Grant Calcaterra after drafting Eli Stowers, suggesting Calcaterra's role is unlikely to expand significantly and that Stowers is the preferred tight end option.

Insight page

Hunter Henry

PositiveValue22:38

Davis Mattek passed on Hunter Henry in favor of Dalton Schultz, explicitly stating 'That is me saying that I know better than the market.' Henry posted 45 yards per game, 1.73 yards per route run, and 10.5 points per game last year as the number one weapon without A.J. Brown on the team. Mattek argues Schultz is the better pick despite similar production (Schultz: 10.4 PPG, 1.56 YPRR) because Schultz is younger, has a higher target share, runs more routes per game, and doesn't play alongside an elite receiver like Brown. Mattek also notes personal preference: 'Hunter Henry's just not a guy who does anything for me.' The source has significant Drake Maye and Hunter Henry exposure but very little Schultz, indicating a portfolio rebalancing away from Henry.

Insight page

Jacory Croskey-Merritt

PositiveValue1:58

Historical example of closing-line ADP value in best ball. Had you drafted Jacory Croskey-Merritt early in the process, you could have gotten him in the 16th–18th round, realistically gaining approximately 80 spots of closing-line value by contest close.

Insight page

Jakobi Meyers

NegativeValue15:15

Davis Mattek selected Jakobi Meyers as a double stack with the Las Vegas Raiders despite having no real ADP value. Mattek prioritizes the stack structure and team projection over traditional draft capital, viewing the pairing as well-orchestrated for best ball success. Mattek also drafted Meyers as part of his best ball wide receiver group alongside Justin Jefferson, Ladd McConkey, Brian Thomas Jr., Stefon Diggs, Trey Tucker, and Jerry Jeudy.

Insight page

Jalen Coker

NegativeValue18:18

The source identifies Jaylen Coker as a potential pick option but does not pursue him, instead focusing on Jordan Mason as the biggest faller available at running back.

Insight page

Javonte Williams

NegativeValue4:28

Drafted at pick 39 with very slight ADP value. Williams is drafted in the third round and paired with McConkey (fourth round) as a common combination in best ball, though Davis Mattek notes this is a bog-standard team construction. Williams is part of a common permutation where he is drafted very close to ADP alongside Trevor Lawrence, Rico Dowdle, and other players. The combinatorial ownership of Javonte and Treylon Henderson will not be as high as the Lawrence–BTJ pairing, making this a less chalk combination. Mattek includes Williams in his final roster alongside Amari Cooper, Treyvion Henderson, Rico Dowdle, and Jordan Mason.

Insight page

Jerry Jeudy

PositiveValue26:19

Jerry Jeudy was drafted by Davis Mattek as a wide receiver with a different bye week to enable late-round Cleveland Browns quarterback selection. Last year Jeudy posted 7.1 points per game on 34 routes per game with 6.2 targets per game but only 2.9 receptions per game, indicating a significant catch rate issue. Mattek frames Jeudy's value as dependent on whether Deshaun Watson can improve the Browns' quarterback situation, stating 'the whole thing comes down to can Deshaun Watson be better than the worst quarterback in the NFL? The answer is probably no.' However, Mattek's quant model projects 51 receptions, 700 yards, and three touchdowns at Jeudy's draft price, which Mattek deems 'perfectly fine.' Mattek respects Todd Monken's offensive play-calling history but acknowledges the fundamental quarterback limitation. If the Browns can find anything with Monken, Jeudy becomes 'absolutely massive value.'

Insight page

Jordan Addison

NegativeValue20:02

The source uses Jordan Addison as a comparison point, arguing that if Stefon Diggs signs with the Chiefs, Diggs would be the superior pick over Addison, implying Addison is overvalued relative to Diggs' potential landing spot value.

Insight page

Jordan Mason

PositiveValue17:27

Identified as the biggest real-time ADP faller available at the time of selection; Davis Mattek selected Mason to complete the running back position while gaining exposure to a high-upside faller. Mason correlates well with Kyler Murray and Justin Jefferson on the roster while providing a unique bye week (different from Hampton, Javonte Henderson, and Rico) to optimize roster construction with five unique bye weeks at running back.

Insight page

Justin Herbert

PositiveValue8:30

Justin Herbert is projected to be available at pick 82 in this draft scenario, allowing the source to wait on quarterback while prioritizing other positions earlier. This represents solid value for waiting on the position.

Insight page

Justin Jefferson

NegativeValue1:05

Davis Mattek uses Jefferson as an opening-pick example to illustrate closing-line ADP value strategy in best ball, noting that teams with the most projected points and highest ADP value tend to have the best advance rates and high-end finishes. However, at the time of this draft, Jefferson shows no real ADP value, being drafted at or above expected ADP. Mattek pairs Jefferson with Kyler Murray in 4.1% of his teams—notably higher than the 3.5% natural occurrence rate—a combo he accepts due to bye week constraints and roster construction priorities. Jefferson is drafted as part of Mattek's core wide receiver group alongside Ladd McConkey, Brian Thomas Jr., Jakobi Meyers, Stefon Diggs, Trey Tucker, and Jerry Jeudy.

Insight page

Kadarius Toney

PositiveValue17:57

Cited as an example of a high-value ADP faller; Mattek acquired Toney at pick 88, representing the kind of significant ADP discount the source seeks in best ball drafts. This type of discount occurs more frequently on DraftKings than Underdog.

Insight page

Kyler Murray

PositiveValue16:01

Davis Mattek selected Kyler Murray as quarterback in his draft despite having a high combo rate with Justin Jefferson at 4.1% of his teams (compared to 3.5% natural occurrence). Mattek prioritizes roster construction and bye week management over minimizing combinatorial overlap. Mattek also drafted Murray as one of three quarterbacks in his best ball roster alongside Trevor Lawrence and Deshaun Watson as a late-round dust ball option.

Insight page

Kyren Williams

NegativeValue4:21

At pick 34, Kyren Williams would be the natural selection but does not go, indicating he is being drafted ahead of ADP value in this best ball scenario.

Insight page

Ladd McConkey

NegativeBreakout4:21

McConkey is positioned as a year-three breakout candidate with strong correlation to Amari Hampton in the Chargers offense under Mike McDaniel. Davis Mattek projects McConkey for around 1,200 yards and 11 touchdowns, not reaching Tyreek Hill's 2023 ceiling of 1,800 yards and 13 touchdowns, but still a meaningful contributor if the McDaniel vision materializes. However, at pick 34, Mattek expresses a neutral stance on McConkey's value, stating he doesn't think McConkey is fine and doesn't have a strong opinion either way—he's neither this year's JSN nor a huge bust. Mattek suggests that getting DeVonta Smith or Chris Olave falling five spots after ADP would be better value than taking McConkey at 34. McConkey is drafted as part of Mattek's final wide receiver group alongside Justin Jefferson, Brian Thomas Jr., Jakobi Meyers, Stefon Diggs, Trey Tucker, and Jerry Jeudy.

Insight page

Lamar Jackson

NegativeValue7:18

Lamar Jackson went ahead of ADP in this draft, indicating he was selected earlier than his expected draft position.

Insight page

Marvin Jones

NegativeProjection9:45

Marvin Jones is part of the Jaguars receiver target distribution with 108 targets projected by Mike Clay. Included in Davis Mattek's conservative approach to the Jaguars offense where no single receiver is significantly favored. The source maintains balanced exposure across the Jaguars receivers rather than concentrating on any one player.

Insight page

Parker Washington

NegativeProjection9:45

Parker Washington is projected for 108 targets by Mike Clay in the Jaguars receiver distribution. Davis Mattek has capitulated on the Parker Washington narrative and holds 8% exposure. Part of a conservative target distribution where no single Jaguars receiver is significantly favored over others; the source recommends remaining humble on the entire Jaguars situation rather than taking a strong stance on any individual receiver.

Insight page

Quentin Johnston

NegativeRole6:00

Identified as a tertiary player in the Chargers offense under Mike McDaniel; Davis Mattek uses the 2023 Dolphins roster (Tyreek Hill, Waddle, Achane, Mostert) as a comp, noting that tertiary players like Durham Smythe, Berrios, and Cedric Wilson did nothing despite overall offensive success. Additionally, the combo of Johnston at his absolute peak ADP paired with Justin Herbert ahead of his ADP creates super negative expected value in best ball.

Insight page

Ricky Pearsall

NegativeValue19:54

The source uses Ricky Pearsall as a comparison point, arguing that if Stefon Diggs signs with the Commanders, Diggs would be the superior pick over Pearsall, implying Pearsall is overvalued relative to Diggs' potential landing spot value.

Insight page

Rico Dowdle

NegativeValue12:18

Davis Mattek selected Rico Dowdle at basically average draft position to address running back depth. Dowdle is part of a common permutation with Trevor Lawrence, and Mattek notes that the combinatorial ownership of Lawrence and Dowdle will be relatively high as part of standard draft patterns. Mattek also drafted Dowdle as part of his best ball running back group alongside Javonte Williams, Treyvion Henderson, and Jordan Mason.

Insight page

Romeo Doubs

NegativeValue20:18

The source mentions Romeo Doubs as a player whose ADP will not be affected by Stefon Diggs' signing, implying Doubs is not a direct competitor for Diggs' value.

Insight page

Stefon Diggs

PositiveValue19:26

Identified as a closing-line ADP value opportunity; Mattek predicts Diggs' average draft position will move from the 130s to the 100s once he signs with a team, making him superior to multiple current receivers depending on landing spot. If Diggs signs with the Commanders, he beats Ricky Pearsall; if Chiefs, he beats Jordan Addison; if Ravens, he beats Courtland Sutton or Xavier Worthy. Mattek believes it is 'effectively an impossibility' for Diggs to stay at his current ADP after signing.

Insight page

T.J. Hockenson

NegativeValue18:58

Mattek initially passed on Hockenson in favor of Dalton Schultz to avoid bye week clustering (already missing three players in week 6). Later drafted Hockenson at pick 178, approximately 10 spots after ADP, but Mattek expressed significant doubt: 'I honestly didn't really feel that good about that. I just straight up like think T.J. Hockenson's not a very good pick.' The selection was driven by bye week construction constraints rather than conviction in Hockenson's value.

Insight page

Travis Hunter

NegativeValue9:45

Travis Hunter is a Jaguars tight end projected for 68 targets, 42 receptions, 496 yards, and 3 touchdowns by Mike Clay. Davis Mattek is willing to take a stance on Hunter specifically because he's cheap; acknowledges Hunter could be a total zero in fantasy but is comfortable with the risk given the value. Mattek holds 14% exposure in best ball portfolio, the highest among Jaguars players, because of the favorable ADP relative to his role in the offense.

Insight page

Tre Tucker

PositiveValue22:02

Selected as a reach at wide receiver with a week 13 bye (unique on the source's roster), representing a bye-week strategy play. The source is trying to get more exposure to Tucker in best ball.

Insight page

Trevor Lawrence

PositiveRole11:29

Davis Mattek selected Trevor Lawrence at pick 80 as part of a stack strategy with Brian Thomas Jr., taking him ahead of ADP to secure the Jaguars quarterback for the stack. Mattek notes that Kyler Murray is the only other viable stack option if Lawrence is missed, making Lawrence the preferred stack quarterback for the Jaguars receivers. Mattek also drafted Lawrence as one of three quarterbacks in his best ball roster alongside Kyler Murray and Deshaun Watson as a late-round dust ball option.

Insight page

Wan'Dale Robinson

NegativeValue20:18

The source mentions Wan'Dale Robinson as a player whose ADP will not be affected by Stefon Diggs' signing, implying Robinson is not a direct competitor for Diggs' value.

Insight page

Zay Jones

NegativeProjection9:45

Zay Jones is projected for 108 targets by Mike Clay as part of the Jaguars receiver distribution. Part of a conservative target allocation where the Jaguars offense is split among multiple receivers. Davis Mattek recommends remaining humble on the entire Jaguars situation and does not take a strong stance on any individual receiver, treating them as relatively equal bets.

Insight page
Full transcript

Episode Transcript

291
0:02One of the things that we used to spend hours arguing about in the fantasy football best ball streets is the value
0:07of average draft position. Is average draft position just a social construct or is it very important? I mean a lot of
0:13the historical research actually tells us ADP is very important. Nothing is a better predictor of how many points a team is going to score or it's expected
0:22advance rate based on both real time and closing line ADP value. So I'm going to put that to the test in this video
0:30today. Really going to go in with a very simple plan. I mean first off, I'm going to try and get a very good grade from
0:35the flock fantasy overlay tool which you can get on flock fantasy.com if you sign up with code Davis, but more importantly,
0:41I'm going to try and accumulate both as much real time and closing line ADP value as possible. So to do this, I
0:47don't even have my ranks. I deleted my ranks from the app, so it's just going to be me in a best ball mania draft. We're going
0:54to try and get as much value as possible. So I'm not going to be reaching on anyone. The second part of
1:00this is I'm also going to try and get a ton of closing line value. If you're kind of new to best ball, you don't know
1:05what closing line value is, it is basically the difference between the ADP where I draft the guy today. I'm going to take Justin Jefferson here.
1:13So where it's at today versus where it is going to be when the contest closes.
1:18And when the contest closes, then you can see, oh man, I actually got a ton of closing line ADP value. So one of the
1:25examples of that would be someone like Jacory Croskey Merritt last year. You know, had you drafted Jacory Croskey Merritt very early on in the process,
1:33you could have gotten him 18, 16, 17th round, something like that. I mean you could have realistically gotten like 80 spots of CLV there. We are up again and
1:44we are going to take, I mean here you go. I'm not going to use my rankings.
1:47I'm going to go with what is a very popular combo. I'm going to take Amari Cooper and Justin Jefferson. Let's see
1:52how popular that combination is in best ball mania. I mean I'm going to guess that it is very, very popular and that's
1:59okay because the way that you win these tournaments, a lot of people will tell you this, hey man, you need to get
2:04unique and there is a unique component that definitely matters for how your team can project in terms of expected value in a given final. However,
2:14the most important thing, this is something that we've learned from daily fantasy sports sims and then something that's been confirmed as people have
2:20studied Bestball which is the easiest way to win money in a contest where points are awarded is to have the most
2:27amount of projected points. I know that sounds so simplistic and it it it doesn't even feel that fun to go through
2:34the entirety of the off season being like, hey man, I'm really just going to try and get a bunch of rosters that project to score a
2:41ton of points and if I get lucky, I get lucky, but the guys who continue to do well in terms of advance rate and in
2:48terms of high-end finishes in week 15, 16 and 17, those teams year over year based on all kinds of studies have just
2:55been guys who get a lot of closing line value, guys who get a lot of real-time value. Like think about what is going to
3:02be what is going to be better for your team in the long run, right? So, let's say for example, we're about to come up
3:09here at pick 34. What is going to be better? Getting a guy you really like, let's say around pick 34. Let's say you
3:16love Ladd McConkey. I don't think Ladd McConkey is fine. I don't really have an opinion either way. I certainly don't think he's this year's JSN. I don't
3:23think he is a huge bust either. However, what would be better to take Ladd McConkey at 34 or instead to get DeVonta
3:32Smith or Chris Olave falling five spots after ADP?
3:36All of the available evidence suggests that if you're not trying to put your thumb on the scale and say this guy is
3:43better than this guy and there certainly is room for player take drafting. I mean, look, I love player takes. It's It's why I do this, right? It's That's I
3:50make these videos. It's why I have a redraft fantasy football channel where player takes are super important.
3:55But there's a big difference between redraft and best ball and something that I mean a lot of smart people are actually starting to catch up on this.
4:03Ben Gretch wrote a great article about this on his sub stack about 2 weeks ago.
4:07Like there's a huge difference between best ball and redraft. The only thing that matters in redraft is hitting home runs. Whereas you can get some really
4:15good rosters through I mean obviously you need to hit home runs in week 17, but you can get some very very good
4:21rosters through in best ball just hitting a ton of singles. Now we're about to be up on the clock at pick 34.
4:28Kyren would be the pick here. So he doesn't go. So right now like basically nothing matters. There's not a big ADP
4:35value to be had anywhere. I like the correlation between Ladd McConkey and Amari Hampton. I think that if the Chargers are indeed the team that we
4:44that their ADP suggest they are cuz the Chargers I don't know. Who's more overpriced? The Chargers or the Bears?
4:50It's probably pretty close between who is overall the most the the team that is too expensive based on their results thus far, but they're definitely
4:58definitely correlated. Now we are at pick What are we at? Pick 39. So we're going to take Javonte Williams. So we
5:05have very slight ADP values with Hampton, with Javonte.
5:10Uh no real no real value on Ladd McConkey or Justin Jefferson. So this honestly this is a very bog standard team.
5:17This is not a unique combination. I mean maybe if anything the combination would be Ladd McConkey and Javonte Williams except they were going opposite. They've
5:25probably been drafted together a good bit with Javonte Williams going in the third round and Ladd McConkey going in the fourth round. But that to me that
5:33connection between Hampton and Ladd is quite nice because if Ladd McConkey is having this total renaissance season, he's a real year three breakout, then
5:41Amari Hampton is definitely going to be a beneficiary of that because it It means the offense is great. If the Mike
5:47McDaniel vision comes through for the Los Angeles Chargers, I can't really imagine two guys who are going to pay off their price tags more than Hampton
5:54and McConkey.
5:56And maybe you guys could disagree with me. You can comment down below if you feel differently about the way the Chargers offense sets up. But looking
6:02back at how the McDaniel offense really worked for the 2023 Dolphins, the tertiary guys really didn't do much. You know, the Miami Dolphins in 2023 were
6:12second in the NFL in points for, 22nd in the NFL in points against. They had 30 passing touchdowns, which was fourth in
6:20the league. They were second in the NFL in net adjusted passing yards per attempt. But they had Achane, they had Mostert, they had Tyreek, they had
6:28Waddle. But look at all these secondary guys who did nothing. Smythe, Berrios, Cedric Wilson, Salvon Ahmed, Jeff Wilson. They're they're playing
6:36fullbacks. And it doesn't really take a genius to look at the way the Chargers set up this year and be like, "Okay,
6:41well I already know who the tertiary players are." Quentin Johnston is going to be a tertiary player. Trey Harris is going to be a tertiary player. David
6:49Njoku is barely going to do anything.
6:51Charlie Kolar is the Durham Smythe.
6:53They're I guess there really wasn't a Gadsden comparable.
6:57And there also is not a Tyreek Hill comparable, you know. Look, I can you can like Lad McConkey as much as the
7:02next guy. You are not going to talk me into thinking that Lad McConkey is going to be this year's Tyreek Hill. I I don't
7:08think there's any scenario where he gets 1,800 yards or 13 touchdowns. Now we could definitely have 1,200 yards or 13 touchdowns. Or or probably not 13. Maybe
7:1811. Maybe 11 touchdowns for Lad McConkey. But we're going to be up back here in three picks. There is one clear
7:26ADP value still sitting on the board because Lamar Jackson went ahead of ADP.
7:30Christian Watson on the left turn there went at 49. Javonte went a little bit ahead of ADP. Carnell Tate goes ahead of
7:38average draft position now. So we I mean we're we're basically going to have our decision made for us here with De'Andre
7:45Swift at pick 50 if we do get him. I'm totally comfortable taking Henderson.
7:50Although, Henderson is a faller, if you look at the Flock Overlay tool here, we can see that Treylon Henderson has fallen four spots over the last 30 days.
7:59Now, Henderson is the last of this wall of running backs anyway, so ADP or no ADP, Henderson is the absolute And And
8:06look, we just got six spots of closing line uh of of real-time ADP value on Henderson, which is, you know, definitely not nothing. I also know that
8:16the guys coming back here around in round six, I like the wide receivers more than the quarterbacks on this team cuz what we're going to try and do
8:24because we have Hampton and we also have Ladd is I think there's a good chance that we are going to be able to get
8:30Justin Herbert at pick 82. Bryan Thomas Jr.
8:34Do I want to take BTJ or Tyson? I quite like them both.
8:40I think on this team, I'm going to take Well, shuck with Tyson I'm going to take Bryan Thomas Jr. I guess we should talk
8:47a little bit about Bryan Thomas Jr.
8:49because he is one of the most interesting guys in the entire player pool, right? He was not as bad last year
8:55as you remember. I mean, that's one of the most interesting things. He started out the year not like not great. He did
9:02have the big game against Seattle. He also had a big game against the Jets four for 66 and a touchdown. Had three
9:07for 87 against Indianapolis the week before. Obviously, far worse than his baseline, nothing like how he did in the 2024 season. Wide receiver nine, nine,
9:17four, 30, 16, 20, then wide receiver four, three, and 12 all playing with Mac Jones. But, figuring out the Jaguars situation just in general, I think I've
9:29talked about this before, but it to me, it's probably the most important situation to figure out because the Jags have a very high win total. They were
9:37awesome on offense last year and no one knows what to do with them. Like let's uh let's go look at what Mike want Mike
9:45Clay has for them. 108 targets for Parker Washington, 108 targets for Zay Jones, Marvin Jones, 102 targets for Brian Thomas Jr. all the way down at
9:53wide receiver 40. Travis Hunter for 68 targets, 42 receptions, 496 yards, three touchdowns and still only 85 targets for Brevin Jordan, which is if you are being
10:04responsible that's pretty much how you have to project the Jacksonville Jaguars. I I would think that any kind of high-level math-based drafter, so like think about
10:14like what Leone would do, think about what uh you know, the guys that like run the Sims like when they're setting up,
10:19you know, my friends over there at runthesims.com, they're going to be setting up things in a pretty conservative manner because I don't
10:27think that it really makes much sense to have a huge opinion on one of those guys.
10:32Now, I'm not taking a huge stance on any of them. If you know, if you look at my exposures for the Jacksonville Jaguars,
10:38if I pull up the Flock Best Ball Portfolio Tool, you're going to see that I basically am comfortable taking all those guys. I think
10:46I have almost fully capitulated on the Parker Washington thing. You know, I think Parker Herbert goes to the QJ drafter at 67.
10:55There's an example of a combo that I think is super negative EV. You're drafting Quinton Johnston at his absolute peak and you're drafting Justin
11:04Herbert ahead of his ADP. So that would just be very tough for me to get to. But back to the back to the Chargers or back
11:10to the Jaguars situation.
11:12I I have a hard time taking a stance on any of them really other than Hunter and that's just because Hunter's cheap. You
11:19know, I'm willing to I certainly am man enough to admit that Travis Hunter could be a total zero in fantasy football. All
11:26right, we are on the clock at pick 80.
11:29We need a quarterback. I took Brian Thomas Jr. I'm going to take Trevor Lawrence here because we are going to get behind a
11:36quarterback if we don't take him there because Kyler is looking like our only other stack, but I missed out on my
11:42charger stuff and and that's okay.
11:45But I I think that remaining humble with the Jacksonville Jaguars is quite the right way to do it. You know, I have got
11:5414% of Hunter, 11% of Brian Thomas, 8% of Jacoby, 8% of Parker Washington.
11:59That's probably how I'm going to play it for the rest of the year. I mean, you can call me a coward, you could say
12:03whatever, but it's an offense that I want to be invested in, but I also don't think that any of them are significantly
12:10better bets than anyone else. Now, the key thing is do I want to buy the Dipperino on Alec Pierce here or do I
12:17want to shore up the running back position? I am going to go with Rico Dowdle. That is basically at average draft position and you're looking at
12:26this team and you go, "Okay, Lawrence right ahead of ADP, Hampton, Javonte, Henderson, Dowdle, all very close to ADP, Ladd, BTJ." So, you're saying like,
12:36"Okay, these are very common permutations." You know, I think the combinatorial ownership of BTJ and Lawrence is going to be quite high. I
12:45actually don't think the Javonte Treylon Henderson ownership will be combinatorially that high, which is sort of interesting. But basically everyone else on the board is going to be
12:54relatively common pairings. And like there's certainly this element of well, is it that fun to just draft teams that everyone else is drafting? And so, I
13:03need to be mindful of that as I go through the rest of the draft. Like maybe I will do a reach at the end or
13:09maybe I will do a kind of a uncommon stack, right? Like maybe I will attempt to do I don't know. I'm trying to I'm trying
13:17to think of something weird at the end.
13:19Like maybe I will do Cam Ward and Chigoziem Okonkwo as my second quarterback as like my my back stack or whatever.
13:26But also, there are just going to be some chalk pairings that do very well.
13:31You know, I think about this a lot when I'm playing daily fantasy, where sometimes it doesn't even really matter how unique a combo is, you just had to
13:40have it even if it was the most owned combo. Like I've been playing a lot of these World Cup DFS slates, and guess
13:46what, man? You just have to have Lionel Messi. Not that any of these guys are Lionel Messi, or there will be there
13:52will be like I mean, this is a very common thing in DFS, a cheap tight end.
13:56If there's a cheap tight end that ends up being chalk, and that guy scores a touchdown, good luck winning without him. I think Cade Otton has historically
14:03been one of the best examples of that, where when Godwin, Evans, and someone else are out, I mean, Cade Otton turns
14:10into prime Rob Gronkowski, and you just have to have him. Could very well be a circumstance where the combination that does the absolute best in week 15 and 16
14:20to get your team to the final could very well be Thomas and Trevor Lawrence. It doesn't matter that a bunch of people in your pod have
14:27it. That it wouldn't even matter if that was a high advance rate piece. Like, for example, think about last year.
14:33Kyle Pitts. Had Kyle Pitts been the highest advance rate tight end, it literally would not have mattered how chalky he was.
14:41You were not getting to the final without him. He scored like what, 41 points or whatever in in week 15. The
14:46only thing that made the finals a little bit wonkier was just that Kyle Pitts was not that high of an advance rate guy
14:53overall.
14:55But we are about to be back up. This is just sort of interesting. I guess there's probably a lot of very good
15:00drafters in this room. I mean, I'm looking uh guys I know here, G Hartman, uh I know Goods, and my good friend Chad
15:07Cannons in here, Bip Tannon is in here.
15:09So, I'm guessing, honestly, the deal is is there's just a lot of very good drafters in here, because I'm not being
15:15met or maybe there's an auto drafter.
15:17I'm just not really being given an option for any big CLV. And if there and there are going to be opportunities. I
15:23mean, when you're drafting in July, and I'm drafting this in the morning, I'm definitely taking Jakobi Meyers here for the double stack. Uh no real ADP value
15:32there. But again, I I don't care. I don't care. Like this is just a team that should project pretty well. I'm a little bit behind at
15:39tight end, but I don't really care about that because if I get to three tight ends, I'm still going to have the 18%
15:45base advance rate. Uh if I get to seven wide receivers using the Flok tool, I'm going to have a 20% base advance rate.
15:52And if I get to five running backs, I'm going to have a 21% base advance rate.
15:55So this team to me is orchestrated almost perfectly up until this point, even without the big ADP values. Now, another thing I could do here is I could
16:04do the ADP value with Stafford and back stack him with T.J. Ferguson. I'm going to pivot though, and I'm going to take
16:12Kyler Murray because again, I don't really care about the combinatorial stuff. I am going to have a slight issue here at wide receiver because Ladd, BTJ,
16:22and Jakobi Meyers all have the same bye week. So I definitely need to get to seven wide receivers. Um let's see if I
16:28can get the uh the combo tool. This is a This is a very unique thing to me.
16:32Probably is never going to happen to one of you guys. But because I have so many teams in the database on Flok Fantasy, I
16:38have over 1,100 teams loaded up in in the database. I have more API calls to Underdog than the average user. So
16:46sometimes this will glitch out on me.
16:50I I didn't notice the bye week thing until right now. Um so I have 4.1% of my teams have Kyler Murray and Justin
16:57Jefferson. So that's quite a high amount for a combo. And that combo does occur naturally in 3.5% of drafts, which is
17:04again a very high number. So I do need to keep in mind uh this is I will actually give a point to Liam. I will
17:11give a point to the Game Theory Bros right now, which is this is a very, very average team. The average in ADP right
17:18now is standing for very average fantasy football team. And that's first off that [clears throat] is okay. Like I I don't mind that in general. Do I think
17:28that this is an absolute shipper that is destined to win Best Ball Mania? No, I definitely I definitely don't, right? Uh
17:35the thing that is going to make you feel best about that is getting a huge faller, but I'm also positioning myself
17:41to get a huge faller here, right? Uh I mean, we could see Jordan Mason could end up being uh a huge faller here. Uh
17:47like there there are ways for me to set myself up for success. Obviously, I would have preferred one of the fallers
17:54to come for a more expensive player.
17:55Like is there anything better than when you get, I don't know, let's say, "Oh, I got dude, I got Kadarius Toney at pick
18:0188 or something." And that does happen a little bit more on Draft Kings than it does on Underdog, but in just in general
18:08that's what I'm trying to set myself up for in this draft. Uh there's not any real faller coming up here. I definitely
18:15can't take Shakir with a week seven bye.
18:18I could take Coker. I could probably just take Stefon Diggs. Looks like Jordan Mason is the biggest faller here and I could be done at running back
18:28if I selected Jordan Mason. In terms of tight ends, I have Strange and Hockenson coming up later. Although, frankly, I might not want to take them just to give
18:37myself more flex options when all my wide receivers are on bye. We are on the clock. Jordan Mason is our faller here.
18:44It correlates with Kyler Murray and with Justin Jefferson. And now we actually have five unique bye weeks at running back. Hampton, Javonte Henderson, Rico,
18:54and Mason all have a different bye week.
18:56That week, which is quite nice. I wonder how common that pairing is. Jefferson, Kyler, and Mason. I definitely need a wide receiver or a tight end with this
19:06pick.
19:07I'm actually going to a I I am going to avoid the week seven bye. So, I'm not going to take Kincaid.
19:13I could take Goddard here. I could take Diggs here. What do I think? Do I think Goddard is better? Looks like no week 17
19:20stuff with him. So, I'm going to take Diggs and hope that Diggs signs with the team that does not have a week seven by.
19:26I continue to think that Well, there's a cliff There So, there is We've been talking about real-time ADP value. There is a closing line ADP value one with
19:35Stefon Diggs. I mean, nothing is more self-evident to me that the moment that Stefon Diggs signs with the Chiefs, the Commanders, the Raiders, the Ravens, the
19:44Colts, like wherever that dude signs, I mean, what My guess would be that Stefon Diggs' average draft position moves up from the 130s to the 100s.
19:54Like, if Stefon Diggs is on the Commanders, would you rather have Ricky Pearsall or would you rather have Stefon Diggs? What about if Diggs signs
20:02with the Chiefs? Okay, Diggs signs with the Chiefs. Would you rather have Jordan Addison or Stefon Diggs? I'm going Diggs. What if Diggs signs with the
20:09Ravens, right? So, Ravens, would you rather have Courtland Sutton or Diggs? Would you rather have Xavier Worthy or Diggs? Like, I There's not a
20:18scenario to me where he signs and he stays with an average draft position after Wan'Dale Robinson or Jaylen Coker or even Romeo Doubs. I I think it is
20:26effectively an impossibility. So, because I am not getting a ton of real-time ADP value here, it looks like my biggest real-time ADP value has been
20:37Jordan Mason. I probably should focus on some closing line ADP value. So, I should focus on, you know, Deebo Samuel would be another
20:46one. Maybe one of the injury guys, right?
20:49Uh although, if I look at my letter grade from the Flock tool, not a very good uniqueness grade. I'm getting a
20:54little bit of ADP value, but I'm also getting a ton of an advancement bonus because if you look at the roster
20:59construction tool here, I am just in a great part of the game tree. Base rate on a 20,000 team sample for running
21:06backs with the capital that I spent is 21%.
21:10Where I'm at with wide receivers, if I get to seven, the base rate is 21%. If I get to three tight ends, I mean, I tell
21:16you what, the number one thing that I have learned from the Flock Fantasy overlay tool and the historical Best Ball Mania Best Ball Mania data has
21:24actually been that three late tight ends is the most undefeated strategy possible. Any way you slice and dice it, you cannot get elite tight end teams to
21:33look good. Now, why can't you get elite tight end teams to look good? Because there's been some huge profile bust in
21:39the data set, right? Bowers last year, huge bust. The year that Kelce was a first-round pick, he was a huge bust.
21:45So, that the the sample size is just not that large of elite tight ends early in these drafts.
21:51But, that's okay, cuz we're still going to draft Brock Bowers sometimes. So, we are about to be back up on the clock. Uh
21:57I could take Brenton Strange. The thing is is I I honestly, I really don't want to. Like I I like the stacking element,
22:05but we are now talking about too many parts of my team being on bye in week seven. We would have 1 2 3 4 5 players
22:15missing if I took him. So, what I'm going to do is I am instead going to take Trey Tucker, who is a week 13 bye. Tucker, a
22:26guy I'm trying to get a little bit more of. And uh I'm also going to do a reach here at the tight end position, which is
22:34something that I started the video saying I didn't want to do. Obviously, as you cascade down the draft, reaches matter a little bit less because their
22:42absolute dollar amount comes down. So, instead of taking T.J. Hockenson for the stack, because I'm already going to be missing three players in week six, what
22:52I'm going to do is I'm going to take Dalton Schultz, who has a week eight bye. So, that is a unique bye on my
22:58team. No other player has a week eight bye. And I just like Dalton Schultz. Um I think Dalton Schultz is the classic
23:05example of a player who's just like a little bit underrated by the market because he is not very sexy. I passed on
23:11Hunter Henry there. That is me saying that I know better than the market.
23:16Hunter Henry last year, 45 yards per game, 1.73 yards per route run, 10.5 points per game, right? That was him as the number
23:25one weapon on the offense. That was without A.J. Brown being on the team.
23:30Dalton Schultz last year in basically the exact same situation, 10.4 points per game, 1.56 yards per route run, uh but a higher target share and more
23:39routes run per game. I think that Dalton Schultz, I'm ready to put this on the record. I think he's a better pick than
23:45I think he's a better pick than Hunter Henry. He is younger than Hunter Henry.
23:49He does not play with A.J. Brown. He's already the sample we have of him is already him playing with an elite wide
23:56receiver. So, I think that is uh I think that is a a relative part of the sample.
24:01I also think the Patriots offense was very good last year. The Houston Texans offense was very bad. I think there is some reason
24:10for optimism that we could feel a little bit better about what the Houston Texans put on the field versus what they did
24:16last year. Like C.J. Stroud could return to something like what he was able to do as a rookie. Be very interesting to see
24:23if that actually happens. I also just admit like Hunter Henry's just a guy who doesn't do it for me. I mean, at the end
24:29of the day, I can have a lot of reasons.
24:31I can tell you guys a lot of things, but I am just not like Hunter Henry's just not a guy who does anything for me, and
24:36I have a decent amount of Drake Maye and Hunter Henry, and I have very little Dalton Schultz. So, that is the direction that
24:44we are going there. Now, T.J. Hockenson is still on the board, which is sort of interesting. Bryce Young is also still
24:51on the board as we are about to come up to pick 178.
24:55So, that would be a huge amount of value.
24:58Um checking the construction tool.
25:01Quarterback, I mean, it is a little bit of a boost. You know what? It is If Bryce Young does not go, that is who I'm
25:07going to take. I'm going to take Bryce Young. He also has a last round stack we could do with him because I Okay, well,
25:13there you go. Bryce Young goes, so it doesn't even matter.
25:16Now, I feel like I got to take Hockenson at pick. So, this is 10 spots after ADP.
25:21I've got Well, no, but I think the same thing still remains. I just don't Oh, he's not a week 7 buy.
25:28Well, what do we do? What do we do? What do we do? What do we do?
25:32What do we do?
25:33Um yeah. All right, we're going to take Hockenson.
25:36I I honestly didn't really feel that good about that. Like like that that is a situation where I feel like that was a
25:43difficult decision we made. I mean, I just straight up like think T.J.
25:46Hockenson's not a very good pick, and I I have this big Viking stack. Now, do I want to try and take a third
25:54quarterback in the end? That's pretty interesting.
25:58Definitely definitely a small boost there if I did do that. I can try and save my third tight end for Do I want to
26:06try and save my third tight end for the next round?
26:10Yeah, because I do need another wide receiver um who has a different buy. And we're going to do Jerry Jeudy, which then does give
26:19me the option to take one of those dust ball Cleveland quarterbacks at the end.
26:24I think that's one of the most situations in fantasy football is what do you do with the Cleveland Browns because they have a play caller who
26:31historically like is very Honestly, Todd Monken is actually very well respected around the NFL. Uh Todd Monken has led some very good offenses. His 2016 2017
26:42uh Tampa Bay offenses were like like high praised, led the Baltimore Ravens to do most yards and most touchdowns in the NFL.
26:53Uh honestly, like I don't even think a lot of what went wrong in 2025 was Todd Monken's fault. His stuff at uh LSU,
27:01where he was the passing game coordinator, and where he was the uh Southern Miss head coach, like he also was a
27:08Georgia offensive coordinator for multiple years. Like Todd Monken has a lot of respect for ball knowers. Jerry Jeudy last year, I mean, this is crazy,
27:17dude. 7.1 points per game on 34 routes per game, 6.2 targets per game, but only 2.9 receptions per game. Obviously, the
27:28whole thing comes down to can Deshaun Watson be better than the worst quarterback in the NFL? The answer is is probably no. Um this is this is
27:37currently my favorite thing to run, but if you go to runningbacksdon'tmatter.com, you go back to 2021, you do minimum quarterback plays 300, and you sort by
27:48the worst quarterback plays of all time.
27:50So, adjusted EPA per play. Look how bad this is, right? So, you've got Bailey Zappe, P.J. Walker, Tommy DeVito, Zach Wilson, Trey Lance, Trevor Siemian,
28:00Deshaun Watson last 5 years, one of the seven worst quarterbacks in football.
28:08Okay? Well, let's see if we can find Mr.
28:09Shedeur Sanders in here. Oh, not enough plays. All right, let's go down to let's go down to 200 plays. So, now there's
28:1581. You've got Shedeur Sanders who's even worse. Shedeur Sanders worse than Zach Wilson, worse than Tim Boyle. So, it's not like it's a good situation.
28:25It's not like you want to take Shedeur.
28:26It's not like you want to take Deshaun Watson.
28:29But if they can find anything with Monken, I mean, anything at all, then Jeudy, Boston, Concepcion, Fanning, Judkins, these guys are are all
28:39absolutely massive values. For what- whatever it's worth, my quant does have uh Uh Deshaun Watson for 2,000 passing yards and eight passing touchdowns,
28:49Jeudy for 51 receptions, 700 yards, and three touchdowns at the price where I just drafted him in this draft, that is
28:55perfectly fine.
28:57I'm not really into taking Malik Washington here. I definitely need another tight end, and of course of course Terrence Ferguson now. I mean,
29:05it's just it's impossible. Like, you can't have anything good in this life.
29:09Um I am going to take Eli Stowers as our third tight end here. I continue to be higher than the market on Eli Stowers. I
29:18am fine with that. I I think he is I I think it's very unlikely that a team that plays the way the Philadelphia
29:25Eagles do and that are so aggressive, it's very hard for me to imagine them taking Stowers where they did and then
29:31turning the team over to Grant Calcaterra. I I just I find it so so unlikely. I could be wrong, and maybe he
29:38can't play.
29:39Um so now I have to think about do I want to take any of these dust balls?
29:45>> [clears throat] >> I mean I think I do.
29:49I think I do want to take one of these dust balls.
29:52Do I want to take dust ball Lawrence? Do I want to take dust ball Kyler?
29:57We're going to do dust ball Deshaun Watson.
30:01Yeah. We are. I mean That was not it was not one of my proudest moments to take Mr. Watson.
30:08Could have been could have been worse.
30:10Could have been better. That could be close That could be some closing line value. Um in terms of whoever gets to
30:15announce. I mean, let's okay. Would you rather have Deshaun Watson at pick 207 or Aaron Rodgers at pick 162? I mean, I
30:22think I'd probably rather have Deshaun Watson. I tell you what. I This tight end situation, now that you can't get Ferguson at the end anymore, I'm going
30:30to have to reevaluate my tight end strategy a little bit. But, let's recap the team. Let's see how we did. We got
30:37Trevor Lawrence, Kyler Murray, and Deshaun Watson. We have Amari and Hanifan, Javonte Williams, Treyvion Henderson, Rico Dowdle, and Jordan Mason, Justin Jefferson, Ladd McConkey,
30:47Brian Thomas Jr., Jakobi Meyers, Stefon Diggs, Trey Tucker, Jerry Jeudy, Dalton Schultz, T.J. Hockenson, and Eli Stowers. A+ advancement historically. I
30:56didn't really I honestly I didn't really do what I intended to do. I didn't really beat average draft position. And my team is really not all that unique as
31:04you would think. So, I guess that is a cautionary tale in terms of why you could still be interested in playing an
31:11exploitative strategy where you are not really caring that much about ADP because to some degree not even to some degree to a large degree you are needing
31:20to rely on your opponents making mistakes. And my opponents did not make any mistakes here. But, uh I would love to see you guys sign up with me over at
31:29flockfantasy.com. Link to that is in the description. Link to that is in the comments if you want that extension, you want the overlay, you want my rankings,
31:36you want dynasty tools, you want a trade calculator. We got a all kinds of stuff over at flockfantasy.com. And uh you are also
31:44eligible to win 5% of my portfolio at the end of the year. So, all these thousands of teams you can win 5% of the portfolio.
31:52I'm going to be doing a giveaway for someone who signs up to flock fantasy using code Davis. Make sure you like the
31:57video and I'll be back with you guys real soon.

More episodes from Davis Mattek

6