NegativeValueFri, July 24, 2026Listen 26:26 – 26:36
Lamar Jackson headshot

Eisenberg avoided Lamar Jackson, preferring Hall's value.

Lamar JacksonQBBAL

Jamie Eisenberg passed on Lamar Jackson in favor of Breece Hall, suggesting he views early quarterback selection as poor value relative to running back options at that draft stage.

View Lamar Jackson 2026 fantasy football value pagePlayer profile with fantasy value, ADP, projections, news, and source-backed STACKED insights
Source transcript excerpt
Jamie did not take Lamar Jackson over Brees Hall.
Common questions

Lamar Jackson fantasy football FAQ

What did Fantasy Football Today say about Lamar Jackson?
Jamie Eisenberg passed on Lamar Jackson in favor of Breece Hall, suggesting he views early quarterback selection as poor value relative to running back options at that draft stage.
Is this good or bad for Lamar Jackson's fantasy football value?
STACKED tags this as a negative fantasy football signal for Lamar Jackson (QB BAL). Eisenberg avoided Lamar Jackson, preferring Hall's value.
Where can I see Lamar Jackson's full 2026 fantasy outlook, projections, and ADP?
Lamar Jackson's complete 2026 fantasy football outlook — projections, ADP movement across every platform, injury context, and all source-backed STACKED insights — is on their STACKED player profile.
Related signal

More player and source insights