NegativeValueMon, July 27, 2026Listen 34:04 – 34:11
Lamar Jackson headshot

Too expensive in third round for half-PPR; prefers RB-RB start.

Lamar JacksonQBBAL

In a half-PPR league, Davis Mattek would not take Lamar Jackson in the third round, indicating the quarterback's ADP is too high relative to the source's valuation in that format. The source prefers a double running back start in half-PPR scoring.

View Lamar Jackson 2026 fantasy football value pagePlayer profile with fantasy value, ADP, projections, news, and source-backed STACKED insights
Source transcript excerpt
In a half PPR league, you prefer a double running back start. I would not take Lamar in the third round for sure.
Common questions

Lamar Jackson fantasy football FAQ

What did Davis Mattek say about Lamar Jackson?
In a half-PPR league, Davis Mattek would not take Lamar Jackson in the third round, indicating the quarterback's ADP is too high relative to the source's valuation in that format. The source prefers a double running back start in half-PPR scoring.
Is this good or bad for Lamar Jackson's fantasy football value?
STACKED tags this as a negative fantasy football signal for Lamar Jackson (QB BAL). Too expensive in third round for half-PPR; prefers RB-RB start.
Where can I see Lamar Jackson's full 2026 fantasy outlook, projections, and ADP?
Lamar Jackson's complete 2026 fantasy football outlook — projections, ADP movement across every platform, injury context, and all source-backed STACKED insights — is on their STACKED player profile.
Related signal

More player and source insights