NegativeValueMon, August 3, 2026Listen 52:23 – 52:57
Mark Andrews headshot

Passed despite recommendation; preferred three-TE build instead.

Mark AndrewsTEBAL

Ron Stewart expressed reluctance to draft Mark Andrews despite draft tool recommendation and draft pressure to select him, stating 'I didn't really want Mark Andrews.' Stewart ultimately built a three-tight-end team instead, indicating a preference against Andrews at his current draft position.

Captured by STACKED 2 hr after posting

View Mark Andrews 2026 fantasy football value pagePlayer profile with fantasy value, ADP, projections, news, and source-backed STACKED insights
Source transcript excerpt
Thing wants us to take Mark Andrews... I didn't really want Mark Andrews.
Common questions

Mark Andrews fantasy football FAQ

What did Ron Stewart say about Mark Andrews?
Ron Stewart expressed reluctance to draft Mark Andrews despite draft tool recommendation and draft pressure to select him, stating 'I didn't really want Mark Andrews.' Stewart ultimately built a three-tight-end team instead, indicating a preference against Andrews at his current draft position.
Is this good or bad for Mark Andrews's fantasy football value?
STACKED tags this as a negative fantasy football signal for Mark Andrews (TE BAL). Passed despite recommendation; preferred three-TE build instead.
Where can I see Mark Andrews's full 2026 fantasy outlook, projections, and ADP?
Mark Andrews's complete 2026 fantasy football outlook — projections, ADP movement across every platform, injury context, and all source-backed STACKED insights — is on their STACKED player profile.
Related signal

More player and source insights