Flock Fantasy artwork

Running Backs will Ruin Your Fantasy Team

STACKED extracted the fantasy-relevant player signal from this video and kept the full transcript here for context.

14 min
Duration
Estimated from transcript
Jun 13, 2026
Published
Sat, June 13, 2026
21
Player insights
13
Players mentioned
Topics
Bijan RobinsonBreece HallDavante AdamsJahmyr GibbsJavonte WilliamsNico CollinsTee HigginsTravis EtienneBrock BowersChristian McCaffreyJonathan TaylorMalik NabersSaquon Barkley
Player analysis

Player insights

21

Bijan Robinson

PositiveProjection11:11

Flock is thrilled to take Bijan Robinson at 1.01 or 1.02, calling him one of the two most valuable fantasy assets after back-to-back elite finishes and every-game availability.

Insight page
PositiveProjection11:11

Elite three-down bellcow with back-to-back top-3 finishes (RB3 in 2024, RB2 in 2025); plays every game, in prime of career, glued to passing game. The source recommends as 1.01/1.02 pick with premium justification: 'rare running back whose floor actually justifies a massive premium price.' Proven best back in football for past two years.

Insight page

Breece Hall

NegativeValue13:00

Flock classifies Breece Hall at the end of Round 2 as a trap running back price, preferring wide receiver values in that range.

Insight page
NegativeBust13:00

Identified as a trap RB to avoid at the end of round 2. Flock Fantasy classifies Hall among 'trap running backs right now' going at inflated ADP. Context: the source argues RBs bust 28% of the time at top-12 and the market is overvaluing the position after two great years; Hall represents the premium-priced mid-tier RB that should be faded in favor of WR discounts.

Insight page

Brock Bowers

PositiveValue12:34

Pass-catcher included in Flock Fantasy's recommended draft core as part of a league-winning strategy that allows flexibility on mid-round RBs. Source states: 'If I can start my draft off, say with Bijan Robinson, Brock Bowers, Tee Higgins, Davante Adams, and Nico Collins, hell, I'm fine being light on running back two or running back three.' Positioned as a stable, high-floor asset that enables fading premium-priced mid-tier RBs in favor of WR discounts.

Insight page

Christian McCaffrey

PositiveValue0:36

Elite early-round RB now priced as a value trap. Drafted at pick 20 average in 2024, now at pick 11 average in 2026—pulled up almost a full round due to recency bias following two strong seasons (2024–2025) where top-12 RBs hit at 58% and 67% rates respectively. The source argues this represents a value trap: the same production now costs premium draft capital, whereas in 2024 early RBs were underpriced and represented genuine edge. Market has overvalued the position after recent success.

Insight page

Davante Adams

PositiveValue12:12

WR discount pick recommended in round 5 as part of the source's draft strategy to capitalize on market overvaluing RBs. The source states: 'Once we get to round five, I want to look at a name like Davante Adams.' Positioned as cheaper, more reliable alternative to mid-round RBs; part of stable, league-winning receiver core that allows flexibility on mid-round RB selections.

Insight page
PositiveValue12:26

Flock points to Davante Adams in Round 5 as the kind of cheaper wide receiver value he wants while others pay the running back premium.

Insight page

Jahmyr Gibbs

PositiveProjection11:11

Flock is thrilled to take Jahmyr Gibbs at 1.01 or 1.02 because Gibbs has back-to-back top-three running back finishes, perfect availability, and passing-game attachment.

Insight page
PositiveProjection11:11

Elite three-down bellcow with back-to-back top-3 finishes (RB2 in 2024, RB3 in 2025); plays every game, in prime of career, glued to passing game. The source recommends as 1.01/1.02 pick with premium justification: 'rare running back whose floor actually justifies a massive premium price.' Not recency bias—proven best back in football for past two years.

Insight page

Javonte Williams

NegativeBust13:11

Identified as a trap RB to avoid if creeping into the middle of round 3. Flock Fantasy states: 'if we end up seeing guys like Javonte Williams creep up to the middle of round three, the wide receivers are just going to be better picks there instead.' Positioned as an overpriced mid-tier RB that should be faded in favor of WR discounts; represents the market's recency bias overvaluing the RB position.

Insight page
NegativeValue13:12

Flock says if Javonte Williams creeps into the middle of Round 3, wide receivers are better picks there instead.

Insight page

Jonathan Taylor

PositiveValue0:36

Elite early-round RB now priced as a value trap. Drafted at pick 20 average in 2024, now at pick 11 average in 2026—pulled up almost a full round due to recency bias following two strong seasons (2024–2025) where top-12 RBs hit at 58% and 67% rates respectively. The source argues this represents a value trap: the same production now costs premium draft capital, whereas in 2024 early RBs were underpriced and represented genuine edge. Market has overvalued the position after recent success.

Insight page

Malik Nabers

NegativeInjury5:32

Malik Nabers was down for the year in 2025, exemplifying durability challenges that wide receivers faced. However, Flock Fantasy notes that despite this injury, top-12 wide receivers still played 14.3 games on average versus top-12 running backs at 15.4 games, and wide receivers busted at 25% versus running backs at 33% in 2025, supporting the thesis that RBs are the riskier position.

Insight page

Nico Collins

PositiveValue12:11

Flock wants to exploit the wide receiver discount by taking Nico Collins in Round 3 instead of chasing overpriced running backs.

Insight page
PositiveValue12:12

WR discount pick recommended in round 3 as part of the source's draft strategy to capitalize on market overvaluing RBs. The source states: 'I want to be taking a wide receiver like Nico Collins in round three.' Positioned as cheaper, more reliable alternative to mid-round RBs; part of stable, league-winning receiver core that allows flexibility on mid-round RB selections.

Insight page

Saquon Barkley

NegativeValue0:43

Barkley is presented as a contextual comparison to McCaffrey in the elite RB tier discussion. The speaker expresses personal preference for McCaffrey over Barkley despite long-term interest in Barkley, illustrating the draft preference shift within the top-tier running back market. This reflects the broader market dynamic where elite RBs have become more expensive (pick 11 average in 2026 vs. pick 20 in 2024), forcing difficult choices among premium options.

Insight page

Tee Higgins

PositiveValue12:12

WR discount pick recommended in round 4 as part of the source's draft strategy to capitalize on market overvaluing RBs. The source states: 'Once we get to round four, I want to be going through and drafting Tee Higgins.' Positioned as cheaper, more reliable alternative to mid-round RBs; part of stable, league-winning receiver core that allows flexibility on mid-round RB selections.

Insight page
PositiveValue12:22

Flock lists Tee Higgins as a Round 4 wide receiver discount he wants to draft while the room overpays for running backs.

Insight page

Travis Etienne

NegativeBust13:00

Identified as a trap RB to avoid at the end of round 2/beginning of round 3. Flock Fantasy classifies Etienne among 'trap running backs right now' going at inflated ADP. Context: the source argues RBs bust 28% of the time at top-12 and the market is overvaluing the position after two great years; Etienne represents the premium-priced mid-tier RB that should be faded in favor of WR discounts.

Insight page
NegativeValue13:05

Flock views Travis Etienne near the Round 2/3 turn as a trap running back price where wide receivers become better picks.

Insight page
Full transcript

Episode Transcript

384
0:00Everybody in fantasy football is telling
0:01you the same thing right now. Get your
0:03running backs early, take two in the
0:04first three rounds, don't get left
0:06behind, running backs are back, baby.
0:08And I'm telling you, that's exactly how
0:10you're going to lose your league this
0:11year. Now, I'm not a zero running back
0:12guy, and not here to tell you that all
0:15running backs are bad, the opposite
0:16actually. Running backs just had the two
0:19best, healthiest, most reliable seasons
0:22we've seen in the last half decade. That
0:24part is true. I pulled up five years of
0:27data and it's right there. The problem
0:29isn't the running backs. The problem is
0:31what you have to pay for them right now.
0:33Because the entire market just watched
0:36those two great years and did the
0:38dumbest thing the fantasy market always
0:40does, it assumed the last two years are
0:42going to be every year. That's recency
0:44bias, and this year recency bias is
0:47wearing the running back jersey. So, let
0:49me show you the data, walk you through
0:51exactly why the price has gotten
0:52completely out of hand, and then most
0:54importantly, show you exactly what to do
0:57about it. Now, let me steel man the
0:59other side first. Because I'm not going
1:00to sit here and pretend the running back
1:02hype came out of nowhere. It didn't, it
1:04came from two incredibly great seasons.
1:07One, start with health. From 2021
1:10through 2023, your top 12 running backs
1:13averaged right around 14 games played.
1:15Um 14.2 basically, that's the historical
1:18baseline. The top 12 guys drafted at the
1:20position, on average, they miss about
1:23say three games. Now, of course, it's
1:25not like every one of them's going to
1:26miss three games, it's you're going to
1:28have a pretty high percentage of them
1:29missing large chunks of the season. The
1:32but look at the past two years. In 2024,
1:35that number was 15.2 games. In 2025,
1:39that number was 15.4.
1:41The top running backs in the league
1:43basically stopped getting hurt. That's a
1:45full extra game of availability per back
1:48compared to the years before, and at the
1:50top of your draft, an extra game or two
1:52from your stud is a massive deal. Now,
1:55the part that really lit the fire, the
1:57hit rate. How often did a top 12 drafted
2:00running back actually finish as a top 10
2:03back? From 2021 to 2023, that number
2:06lived around 36%. Roughly one out of
2:09three running backs that were drafted
2:11inside your top 12 RBs would end up
2:13being a top 10 name. In 2024, that
2:16number jumped up to 58%.
2:20In 2025, that number jumped to 67%.
2:25The hit rate nearly doubled. Two out of
2:27three early running backs paid off last
2:29year. So, if you drafted running backs
2:31early in 2024 and 2025, you're probably
2:34popping champagne in December. I mean, I
2:36get it. In the Flock league, Sal took
2:39McCaffrey and Jonathan Taylor to start
2:41the draft. His vibes, they were
2:42immaculate.
2:43>> I've been waiting
2:45for 10 years to have Saquon Barkley on
2:48my team since I saw him in college.
2:50But, it's not happening this year. Give
2:51me Christian McCaffrey.
2:55>> But, here's the trap, and it's the
2:56oldest trap in fantasy football. The
2:57market saw those 2 years, too. And the
2:59market isn't going to let you buy that
3:01production at the same price ever again.
3:04This is the whole video right here, so
3:06stay with me. In 2024, your top 24
3:09running backs coming off the board were
3:11at an average pick of 45. Pick 45.
3:14That's the middle of the fourth round
3:16territory in a 12-team league. Now, this
3:18year in 2026, that same group, the top
3:2124 running backs, are going at an
3:23average pick of 25.
3:26That is nearly 20 picks earlier, almost
3:29two full rounds. That exact same tier of
3:31players, and now you have to spend two
3:34rounds of premium to draft the same
3:36position. And it's not just the deep
3:38guys. Your top 12 running backs went
3:39from an average draft slot of pick 20 in
3:422024 to pick 11 this year. That elite
3:47tier just got pulled up by almost an
3:49entire round. Now, here's the part
3:50nobody's pointing at. While running
3:52backs got more expensive, receivers got
3:55cheaper. Your top 24 receivers were
3:57going around pick 18 and 1/2 in 2024.
4:00Now, they've slid all the way down to
4:02pick 27. The market flipped. Money
4:05flooded out of the wide receiver room
4:07and into the backfield. So, think about
4:09what actually happened. In 2024, running
4:12backs were a screaming value. You got
4:14elite production at a discount and they
4:16hit great, but you weren't smart because
4:19you liked running backs. You were smart
4:21because they were underpriced. That was
4:23the entire edge. It was never about the
4:25position, it was about the price. And
4:27now that edge is gone, completely gone.
4:29You are now paying full retail, premium
4:31retail, for that same exact product.
4:33Same players, way worse value. When
4:36everybody figures out the inefficiency,
4:38it stops being an inefficiency. That's
4:40not a hot take, that's just how the
4:41market works. So, follow the cycle
4:43because it's the whole point. 2023
4:45running backs bust, market sours, prices
4:48crater. 2024, they're cheap, they hit,
4:52the sharp money cleans up. 2025, they
4:55hit again. Now, they're healthier than
4:57ever and the narrative completely flips
4:59to draft running backs early. And here
5:01we are in 2026, where running backs are
5:03the most expensive we've really ever
5:06seen them and you're being told to buy
5:07at the top of the cycle right after two
5:10perfect seasons. That's not a strategy,
5:12that's just chasing last year's perfect
5:14numbers. Now, you may ask, "Okay, Flock,
5:17but what if running backs are just
5:18healthier now? What if it's a real
5:20shift?" Fair question, let me show you
5:23why I don't buy it and the data does the
5:25talking here. In 2025, your top 12
5:28running backs played 15.4 games. Your
5:32top 12 wide receivers played 14.3. Read
5:34that again. The running backs were more
5:36available than the wide receivers. You
5:38can just remember Malik Nabers obviously
5:40down for the year. And not only that,
5:42but you had additional bust inside those
5:44top 12 names. And that has basically
5:47never been true. Wide receiver is the
5:48lower contact and lower injury position.
5:51Historically, receivers outplay running
5:53backs in games every year. In 2025, that
5:56flipped. And when you see a physically
5:58punishing position suddenly become the
6:00most durable position in fantasy
6:02football for one season, that's not a
6:04new normal. That's the textbook
6:06definition of a number that's about to
6:07regress. The thing that made running
6:09backs special last year is the single
6:11most likely thing to break. And here's
6:13the kicker that ruins the narrative.
6:15Even in 2025, the healthiest, highest
6:18hit rate running backs that we have on
6:20record, the bust rate of your top 12
6:22running backs was still 33%. One in
6:25three in the best season ever. Now, hold
6:28that up against the receivers. The same
6:30season, your top 12 receivers busted at
6:3325% lower than running backs managed in
6:36the running backs' best season ever. And
6:38rewind to 2023, the top 12 wide receiver
6:41bust rate was 8%. 8 to position the
6:45entire industry is telling you to fade
6:48has quietly been the safer bet the whole
6:50time. So, I've spent 12 minutes telling
6:52you what's wrong, and let me give you
6:54the part that you actually clicked for,
6:55what to do about it. And of course, I
6:57will say I am taking all the data from
7:00this, and I am making my 2026 fantasy
7:04football rankings with this in mind. All
7:06of our 2026 fantasy football draft
7:09sheets with all the historical numbers
7:11in mind. And those draft sheets are
7:13going to be able to be applied to your
7:14ESPN, your Sleeper, your Yahoo leagues.
7:17They'll be tailored exactly to the
7:19league format and platform that you are
7:21drafting on. And you'll have draft
7:23assistants to help you in real time, all
7:26on flockfantasy.com. Not only are you
7:28getting all of that from myself, but
7:30from all your favorite creators that you
7:32watch on YouTube. You can find the link
7:34to flockfantasy.com in the description
7:37and the comment section. The 2026 season
7:39pass is only $34 right now. And if you
7:43use code flock, I'm also going to be the
7:44one answering your questions during the
7:47season in live streams. But, the number
7:49one thing is I'm not telling you to fade
7:51running backs. I'm telling you to stop
7:52overpaying for them. There's a
7:53difference. If an elite back falls to
7:55you at a fair value, take them. What I
7:57will not do this year is reach up around
8:00to grab a second or third running back
8:01just because the room is panicking. Let
8:03the table pay the recency tax. You don't
8:06have to. Number two, follow the money in
8:08the other direction. While everybody's
8:10been bidding up running backs, your wide
8:12receivers just got cheaper. Top 24 wide
8:15receivers slid from pick 18 on average
8:18to pick 27 over the past two years.
8:20That's the same kind of discount we had
8:22with running backs in 2024. The discount
8:24that made them the winning play. The
8:27value didn't disappear. It just walked
8:29across to the wide receiver room. And
8:31here's the thing nobody wants to say out
8:33loud, because the last two years turned
8:36running backs into the shiny object.
8:38Zoom out to the last five years. The
8:40receivers have just been the better pick
8:42at every tier on every metric that
8:44matters. Start with availability. Over
8:46the past five seasons, your top 24
8:49drafted wide receivers averaged 14.4
8:53games a year. Your top 12 running backs,
8:5514 flat. Go all the way down to the top
8:5836 drafted receivers and top 36 drafted
9:01running backs, you have 14.3 games for
9:04the receivers versus 13.9 for the
9:07running backs. Receivers just play more
9:09games, get injured less. Now,
9:11reliability, and this is where it gets
9:13ugly. At the top 24 level over the past
9:16five years, receivers busted 28% of the
9:19time. Running backs were at 34% and the
9:22receivers didn't just bust less, they
9:25hit the top end ceiling more. Top 24
9:27drafted receivers finished inside the
9:30top 10 of their position 34% of the time
9:33versus running backs were at 29%. So, at
9:36the same draft year, the receiver room
9:38hands you fewer bust
9:40and gives you more league winners. And
9:42at the very top, it's the same story.
9:44Top 12 wide receivers busted 22% of the
9:46time. Top 12 drafted running backs
9:48busted 28% of the time. And get this,
9:51those five-year numbers already include
9:54the two greatest running back seasons on
9:56record, even after 2024 and 2025 dragged
9:59the running back averages up, receivers
10:01are still ahead across the board. So,
10:04think about what each side is actually
10:06asking you to believe. The running back
10:08case asks you to bet that the last two
10:10years are the new forever. The receiver
10:12case is just the whole five-year sample.
10:15I know which side of that bet I want to
10:17be on, and right now it's the cheaper
10:19one, too. Number three, let the cycle
10:21work for you instead of against you. The
10:23sharp move was never always draft
10:26running backs or never draft running
10:28backs. It's buy the position the market
10:30is scared of, sell the position that the
10:32market is in love with. Right now, the
10:34market is terrified of nothing at
10:36running back and forgetting that
10:37receivers exist, so that's your edge.
10:40So, this draft season, let your league
10:42reach for that third or fourth running
10:44back in the first five rounds. You sit
10:47back, take the elite running back if the
10:49value's there, then hammer the receiver
10:51discount everyone else is ignoring. When
10:54half of those early running backs do
10:56what running backs always do, and a
10:58third of them will, you're the one
10:59holding the stable, cheaper,
11:01league-winning receiver core. All right,
11:02now that's enough theory. Let me put
11:04actual names on the board because I know
11:06what you're really here for. Who I'm
11:08taking and who I'm letting somebody else
11:10take. Let's start at the very top
11:11because I want to be crystal clear. I am
11:13not anti-elite running back. If I have
11:16the 1.01 or the 1.02, I am thrilled to
11:20take Jahmyr Gibbs or Bijan Robinson and
11:24not have to stress a single day in my
11:26life. Here's why those two are different
11:28from everything I just spent 15 minutes
11:30warning you about. Gibbs finishes the
11:32running back two in 2024 and the running
11:35back three in 2025. Bijan finishes the
11:37RB3 and the RB2 in 2025. Back-to-back
11:40top three seasons for both of them. They
11:42play every single game. They're in the
11:44prime of their career. Three-down
11:46bellcows glued to the passing game as
11:48well. That is the rare running back
11:51whose floor actually justifies a massive
11:54premium price. These aren't recency bias
11:57picks. They're the two best backs in
11:59football and they proven it for the past
12:01two years. They are the most valuable
12:03assets in fantasy. But, beyond that, I
12:06really only want to be taking one or two
12:09of these top-level backs and then once
12:12we get to round three,
12:14four, five, I want to be grabbing the
12:17discounts. I want to be taking a wide
12:19receiver like Nico Collins in round
12:22three. Once we get to round four, I want
12:24to be going through and drafting Tee
12:26Higgins. Once we get to round five, I
12:29want to look at a name like Davante
12:31Adams. And if I can start my draft off,
12:34say with Bijan Robinson, Brock Bowers,
12:38Tee Higgins, Davante Adams, and Nico
12:41Collins, hell, I'm fine being light on
12:44running back two or running back three.
12:46I'll go through and I'll try to identify
12:48the running back values that I like at
12:50the very end of drafts just in case we
12:52do start to have injured running backs
12:54again and we know we are going to have
12:56those waiver wire names that all of a
12:58sudden are exciting. So, I would
13:00classify some of those like the trap
13:02running backs right now would be like
13:04Breece Hall going at the end of the
13:06second round, Travis Etienne there going
13:08at the end of the second round, the
13:09beginning of the third round. And if we
13:11end up seeing guys like Javonte Williams
13:13creep up to the middle of round three,
13:15the wide receivers are just going to be
13:17better picks there instead. So, here's
13:19the bottom line. Running backs aren't
13:20going to destroy your fantasy team
13:21because they're bad. They were great.
13:23They're going to destroy your team
13:24because they were two great years and
13:27the whole market noticed, and now you're
13:29being asked to pay a premium for a
13:30position that gets healthy in lottery
13:32cycles and bust a third of the time even
13:34at the absolute best. Meanwhile, the
13:37receivers, the position that's been
13:38quietly more available, more reliable,
13:40and less bust prone for five straight
13:42years, just went on sale. Don't pay for
13:44last year's hit rate. Don't pay for
13:462025's health. Pay for what the player's
13:48actually worth, and let the recency bias
13:50crowd subsidize your title. If you want
13:53my full updated rankings, the tiers, the
13:56draft sheets, the real-time draft
13:58assistance to flag exactly what running
14:00backs are worth the pick and which ones
14:02aren't, it's all on flockfantasy.com.
14:05Links in the description. Code flock is
14:07going to get me to answer your questions
14:09for free in the live streams this year.
14:11And on top of that, you're going to be
14:12able to get access to not only all of my
14:15stuff, but all of the stuff from all
14:16your favorite creators that you watch on
14:18YouTube. But, please let me know in the
14:20comment section what running backs
14:21you're drafting versus avoiding this
14:23year, and I'll go down there and argue
14:24with you.

More episodes from Flock Fantasy

6