0:00What's going on everyone? Matt Harmon here. Welcome to another edition of Reception Perception, the mailbag. It's the July edition. Training camps are
0:07starting and you guys have a ton of great questions for me today. So, let's get into it.
0:20All right. As always, these questions come in from the reception perception community in the RP Discord. We have a free channel in there for you guys to
0:29throw your questions in. Every single month, we sit down right here on YouTube and do these mailbags. So, subscribe right now to the channel and join the RP
0:37Discord for free if you're a paid subscriber to the site. There are some better tiers available for you. However, you join for free so you can get into
0:44the mailbag action every single month.
0:47All right, with all that out of the way, let's get into it here. Uh, I put the questions into some categories for this
0:53episode here in July. I'm going to try to be a little more organized with these going forward. But our first category is
0:582026 fantasy football/IRRL predictions. And our first question there comes in from Beckfast.
1:06What's one receiver whose underlying reception perception data tells a completely different story than their fantasy ADP? And why do you think the
1:14market is missing it? I think the number one and best example here, and it's one I've been hitting for a while now, but I
1:22certainly believe that this one is just is really mystifying to me, and I think I have some pretty good explanations for
1:28it. It's new Broncos wide receiver Jaylen Wadd, who on Fantasy Pros consensus ADP right now is going off the board in half PPR formats as the wide
1:37receiver 23 51st overall. Um, if you guys have paid attention to the content, you know, maybe you're tuned back in right now, okay? Training camp's coming
1:46up, reddraft season coming up. I get it.
1:49I get it if you dip out during the summer. But if you guys have been watching the shows, reading the content,
1:55you know, I'm going to be way ahead of that number, way ahead of consensus on Jaylen Wadd this year. I think what the
2:03market is missing here on Wadd is actually a few different things. Number one, he's a really, really good player.
2:10As you're seeing on the route graphics right now, he's someone who can win at all three levels. He beats man press
2:16coverage at a really high rate. And the other part of this too is just like it's it's not just reception perception.
2:23Okay, this is one of the most efficient receivers on a per route basis last year. And I have to say per route
2:29because that leads me into the second thing that I think the market is really missing here. and that's that the opportunity that Wadd is going to get in
2:36this offense, it's just fundamentally different than what he had in Miami last year. Like, yes, I I think the the base
2:43reaction for folks here, you know, with Wadd already, he's kind of a guy that people are burned by. You know, there's
2:50been injuries on and off the field type stuff, and I get that. That's frustrating. Okay, I I do understand
2:57that part of it. But on the other hand, like what's important here is that the Dolphins were dead last in plays run
3:08last year. Dead last. And that's going to change in Denver. They were pretty heavy in terms of neutral pass rate.
3:16They ran a lot of plays last year. The opportunity for Waddle on a base standpoint is just going to be way
3:21higher here in Miami. And then the third, excuse me, than it was in Miami in Denver. Then the third thing that I
3:26think people are misunderstanding is that Wadd is going to get a pretty seismic role change in Denver throughout the course of the last few years in
3:34Miami when Tyreek Hill was there and even last year once Tyreek Hill got hurt because their second receiver was Malik Washington who I think is an intriguing
3:42player but is certainly a guy that you need to role cater to. Waddle has been the outside on ball receiver for the
3:48Dolphins offense. And even if they kind of are not super traditional with the receiver roles and and all of that, he
3:53kind of was the nominal ex receiver, which Wadd can do that. We saw the press man coverage success rates here. He he
3:59can get open. He can win in that formation. However, I I actually think he fits much better as like a movement Z
4:06type, which is the role he will be playing for the Broncos this year because Courtland Sutton is just a classic x receiver. if that's really his
4:14best and only position that he can be a starting level receiver at. So with Sutton as the outside on ball receiver,
4:21Wadd moving around the formation, I think he's going to take a careerhigh percentage of snaps off the line of scrimmage, which is going to allow him
4:29to be fully in motion at the snap. Some of those breaking routes that we saw earlier on the route graphic, he's going
4:35to be he's going to just get more targets on those, more efficient targets. I I think back to, and this is
4:42a uh example that I brought up on Football 301 with Nate Ty, like Brandon Cooks in 2016 had his lowest percentage of snaps on
4:52the ball that year, highest percentage off the line of scrimmage because they drafted Michael Thomas, who was the exceiver of that offense. I know people
4:59remember as a big slot, he was not. He was the exceiver. And then Willie Sneed was kind of that on ball slot receiver.
5:06And I think Pat Bryant ends up being that on ball slot receiver. Courtland Sutton is the X. Wadd's going to be
5:11moving all around here. The efficient targets will be there. I think there's a lot of ways the market is misreading Jaylen Wadd. To me, he should be closer
5:20to wide receiver 12 than wide receiver 24. I just think the market has this one completely wrong. I'm going to be really
5:28in on Waddle this year. I actually felt when they made the trade for him, I made this comparison on the show that I think
5:37he's going to be like Stefon Diggs was to Josh Allen for Bo Knicks and uh Davis Webb, who was the backup quarterback in
5:45Buffalo for portion of his career, now the offensive coordinator there in Denver. He actually made that same comparison at uh camp earlier this week.
5:53So, I thought that was interesting. So, two just a few more here to throw out here really quickly. Won't break these
5:57down in detail. I think you could argue Michael Wilson is one wide receiver 37 89th overall. I mean, he's not going
6:04super super aggressively or anything like that. He's not he's not going super late either. He's just kind of in a whatever zone of wide receiver threes,
6:10which I think is probably fine considering the environmental factors.
6:13But Michael Wilson's a really good player, man. Think I I do think the market is maybe kind of overindexing on the fact that
6:21regression is coming for him. Really good player. I think he's got a good little role there in the Cardinals passing game, but we obviously have
6:27questions about that team. And then there's no question that the Persaw Reed Downs group of 99th to 120th overall in consensus ADP. Obviously reception
6:36perception data tells a really different story than those guys just being kind of, you know, throwaway players, which is, you know, not completely throwaway
6:45rankings there. 99th to 120th overall, but I'm going to be higher in the market on those three guys. Of course, I really
6:50like the range of wide receiver there as you get into the later rounds. Okay, next question here from Big Lou and a
6:58bunch of numbers here. Who are three wide receivers who excelled in 2025 but you are avoiding at cost in 2026 for
7:06whatever reason. Let's get into a few of them here. Okay, number one, I I I wish AJ Brown was just a round cheaper. Okay,
7:15that's that's for me here. I think I wish AJ Brown was around cheaper.
7:20I don't like totally want to be out on AJ this year, but I don't think the market is pricing in enough that we did
7:26see some signs of decline.
7:28Certainly in his reception perception charting. Uh James and I did a whole conversation recently about how I could be wrong about that. So check that out
7:36on the podcast. Um threw a tweet about about it as well too. So uh it's definitely out there. Like if he plays
7:43more Z, I think that would help. But sounds like he might play more ex receiver than that based on early camp
7:48reports, but it is very early. I just wish again he was like a round cheaper.
7:52I just can't consider him when he goes in the same range of like Drake London.
7:55I I I just need him to be going around later there. I also think Rashi Rice, I mean, listen, I I know I'm lower than
8:01consensus on Rice maybe as a player, and perhaps that bleeds too much into my fantasy analysis, but I do think that
8:08where Rice is going right now as a low-end wide receiver, one, there's just so many other good receivers in that range that don't present both an injury
8:15and an off-field risk. Plus, I think there should be a little more concerned that the Chiefs move away from Rice and
8:23kind of the gimmicky, scammy targets. I do think he could be still a useful receiver as a big slot zone coverage
8:31beater. All the things I've talked about in reception perception, but some of those like easy button targets of his could go away if the run game is better.
8:40And there's just no way the run game won't be better with Kenneth Walker here. So, um, they were had a 2.9%
8:47explosive run rate the last two years, did the Kansas City Chiefs, which ranks dead last by a lot in the last two
8:54seasons. uh Walker will remedy that. And I do think if they're trying to hit more home runs in the run game, maybe they do
9:00less of the scammy passing game targets to kind of be the extension of the run game. So, I think that's worth noting
9:07there. Courtland Sutton's a guy that was pretty productive last year, but I I just won't be in on it cost this year. I
9:13think he's just a straight up floor play with no real ceiling. I'm shooting for a little bit more of a ceiling at that
9:20point of the draft. And again to go back to the last question, when you can pass on Sutton and get Persaw, Reed, Downs
9:28later, I'm going to take the ceiling shot on those guys because I think the ceiling case for those those guys are
9:34higher and I think the floor case is actually not like it's a negligible difference between them and Sutton.
9:41Lastly, I would just say we got to wait on Malik Neighbors injury updates. Um I he's somebody I want to be in on. No
9:47question about it. I like the fact that he didn't start camp on the PUP, but we still got a lot of hurdles to cross
9:52there with Neighbors. Uh, great great talent, a guy that is right there knocking on the door to be a tier one
9:57receiver based on his charting in a brief moment last year. But again, got to still wait on the injury news before
10:04we decide whether we're going to be in on him at cost this year. All right, next one up here. Pug nail asks sleeper
10:13pick who uh who could establish himself as a top 10 wide receiver. I'm thinking of this both from fantasy and a real
10:21life perspective and there's a lot of candidates I think I really like in terms of could jump into the top 10 wide
10:28receiver rankings just cuz in my mind I actually think that there's a tier drop off maybe around like nine or so. So
10:35there's probably a lot of guys just based on your opinion of the players who could creep in there just based on what
10:42happened this season. Like I would say that the tier probably goes from in real life wide receiver nine to ballpark at
10:50like 15 14 maybe even deeper than that honestly. So there's a lot of candidates but someone that I think could do it in
10:56both like be a top 10 receiver in fantasy and kind of cement themselves as a top 10 NFL receiver is Zay Flowers.
11:02Man, Zay Flowers at this point has been one of the best zone beaters in the NFL over the last since he's been in the
11:10NFL, he's been one of the best zone beaters uh that I've charted every single season. He makes explosive plays.
11:15He got even better against press coverage last year. Took a real big step forward winning against press coverage, like releasing quickly off the line of
11:25scrimmage against press. That to me is very similar to like the jump that Aman Rosane Brown made in his third season.
11:31fourth season makes another jump against press and now we know that St. Brown was one of the most involved receivers around the goal line last year like in
11:40scoring area. That's how he went from being, you know, a guy obviously a great player, always been a great player, but
11:46really took that next next step. And I do think Zay Flowers could be someone to make that jump this year. I really like
11:53Flowers charting data and everything it showed us. And he was a top 10 fantasy receiver actually over the full year last year as well. So I really like Z
12:01Flowers. I think he's kind of gotten a little underrated based on some of his early career mistakes. He's really established himself as a much more
12:07steady player, more consistent, and I think developing in some critical ways that could have him make like a year four leap. Honestly, he looked like he
12:15was about to make a year three leap last season before that offense kind of went to chaos after some Lamar Jackson
12:20injuries. All right, last one here in this section. KY Bourbon guy asks us, "Who are some of your darkh horse candidates to be the lone receiver out
12:29on the field when these teams load up with 12, 22, 31?"
12:34Yeah, the whole deal. All the personnel package, the heavy personal package, long and short of it. Honestly, I think Z Flowers is a good name uh because he
12:42can beat man press coverage and he can make explosive plays on downfield routes. He's always been so so good on those big outbreakers. He's someone to
12:50consider. I do think Marvin Harrison Jr.
12:53is another one. Honestly, kind of already was that player when healthy in Drew Petting's offense when this team throws out a ton of tight ends. And by
13:01the way, they have someone there on that Cardinals roster. Elijah Higgins, who is a tight end, used to be a wide receiver,
13:09could maybe mimic some of what Terrence Ferguson did as that clear out player out of 13 personnel if they want to get
13:15into that. And that would allow Harrison to run some of the big inbreakers and outbreakers that he's really good on as
13:20well. DJ Moore is another really interesting candidate to talk about here that I don't think gets discussed enough. Again, already was kind of that
13:31guy for the Bears last year when you look at the Bills roster if they're able to load up with three tight ends on the
13:36field, which absolutely could happen.
13:38Dawson Knox, Dalton Concincaid, again, Concaid could maybe be that clear out player. Um certainly not that fast, not as fast as Terrence Ferguson, but is a
13:46little bit of a vertical receiver. And Jackson Halls is the true blocking tight end. DJ Moore um is really good on the
13:53vertical plane. His nine route success rate was really good last season. His curl route success rate was really high in a small sample. I actually think he
14:00still works really well on those deeper stop routes. Josh Allen likes to throw those. I could see him being an answer
14:07in the, you know, kind of single receiver sets. Last two like deeper names I would throw out that maybe are the actual good answers to this question
14:16if we're talking about true dark horses.
14:18That would be Jaden Higgins, secondyear receiver of the Houston Texans, and Trey Harris, secondyear receiver, Los Angeles Chargers. Higgins, um, is someone that I
14:29actually was pretty impressed with his separation ability on those 90° breaking routes, digs, and outs. You see, he ran them at a high volume. He won them at a
14:39pretty solid rate as well. Big post route success rate there. I mean, I think that Higgins, you know, I was a
14:46little lower on Higgins as a prospect, maybe relative to some other folks, but still thought he was a day two receiver.
14:52He goes on day two, he goes really high on day two. And I think the thing with Higgins is that he's someone who needs
15:00kind of the right role catering to win.
15:02And I I think they got it right at times last year in Houston. To me, he just needs to be like a big Z receiver when
15:09they spread it out, get him off ball, get him some slot reps. I'd love to see him rotate in the slot with like Jaylen
15:16Null this year, but in in like a single receiver situation, he could be the lone guy. And I do think this team is going
15:24to go into heavier personnel packages and run some of those like big digs and and outbreakers because he can separate pretty well on those kind of in like
15:32maybe a Michael Pitman way player compwise. He had some different comps in our player comparison tool. But yeah, someone that I definitely think can win
15:40on those like more explosive shot play situations there. Plus, he's a pretty good blocker. Uh, as a Nico Collins backer, this would stink if he lost some
15:48of those reps and he's so good in these situations, too. But obviously, Collins is a guy you want to avoid injuries
15:54there. So, he's a darkhorse candidate to be that guy. And Trey Harris kind of the same thing where was pretty good on some
16:01of those breaking routes and he has an exceiver background from college. So, I think he could dabble in that work as
16:06well. All right, let's get into some specific team building or wide receiver room questions here. Like, this is these are specific wide receiver rooms or like
16:17we're building a hypothetical wide receiver room. These are these type of questions here. So, first one comes in from Goose Mayak.
16:24You are building an NFL offense from scratch. You can pick one wide receiver from tiers two and three of your dynasty
16:31ranking. one from tier four and one receiver from tier five or later. What is the best combination? What are the hallmarks of the system you're running?
16:41And uh if it helps or if it's fun, what arc type of quarterback is running it?
16:45All right, so this was really fun to to to look at here because a lot of different interesting ways to go about
16:51this. I I actually thought about this for probably an alarming amount of time.
16:56Uh, but ultimately we ended up going with in tiers 2/3.
17:03I mean, look, if you're going to give me the option between tier two or tier three, I'm going to go ahead and take
17:07tier two. Better players.
17:09Number one is going to be Malik Neighbors. And the reason we're taking Malik Neighbors, and and I'm thinking this is healthy Malik Neighbors, by the
17:16way, not like coming into this year banged up. We're hypothetically talking about injuryfree Malik Neighbors.
17:22Again, like I said earlier, this guy is knocking on the door to tier one. and he's ready to be one of those like true
17:26true true tier one receivers. And I'm talking about like Jamar Chase, Justin Jefferson. Like that's the type of guy he can be, okay? And and when you're
17:35talking about a player like that, you could play them every single snap at exceiver and he would be awesome, right?
17:42That type of guy. However, he's fully maximized when you move him around the formation.
17:47And I just think right now, like, you've got to treat your number one receiver like that. You've got to do it. They
17:53have to be someone that you are confident in doing it and you are actively treating them that way as a movearound option. You can't just line
18:02them up at x receiver every single snap.
18:04I think if you do that, you're telling us something about that player or you're telling us something about you as a play
18:10caller. Neither of which are good, by the way. So, I don't need to see him being one of these 80 80 outside on ball
18:15players. And I think Neighbors is truly dangerous when you get him into the slot. really dangerous when you move him around as the offball receiver. So, he's
18:24going to be the guy we build this whole thing around. I still to me like we can build the wide receiver room, you know,
18:30with collectivism and like we get all the guys like we like a wide receiver by committee sort of situation. We got a
18:36one, we got a one be blah blah. To me, I still think it functions best when you have a true number one and you revolve
18:42that room around that guy. That's why I went with neighbors cuz he is absolutely one of those players. So, let me go down
18:48to tier four for our next guy. Give me T. Higgins here. Who I have in tier four of my dynasty rankings. And by the way,
18:56you should subscribe to receptionperception.com and check out the dynasty rankings tool where you can compare my rankings relative to the market and look for some good buys that
19:07way. Okay. So, T. Higgins, a guy I have in tier four, uh just the perfect receiver who's one a baller, but also
19:14allows you to move your number one all around the formation. As we were just talking about, I mean, this literally is
19:20what happens in Cincinnati. Jamar Chase went from being a ex- receiver only player early in his career to someone who moves all around now, gets more
19:29opportunities in motion, gets more opportunities off ball in the slot, etc., etc., because you can play T.
19:35Higgins as the ex receiver and he can win you one-on-one matchups. He can win deep and he can win in the short game in
19:42the intermediate game in tight coverage.
19:44So give me T. Higgins to kind of not just give me a great number two receiver, which is what I think T.
19:49Higgins is. I think he's a two. Give me a great number two receiver who can kind of be close to the quality of a number
19:55one, but even better than that, he's like a force multiplier to my number one receiver. So give me that. And then tier
20:02five, I went with Parker Washington here because I think he's someone who is a slot receiver that's a vertical slot at
20:07this point. Again, you're looking at his route chart on the screen right now. The success rate on posts and corners on the
20:14dig routes, I I really like having that vertical slot receiver so that we can look for explosive plays with him.
20:24And that gives me the ability to work neighbors on some concepts that give him some layups. So they can kind of work
20:31off of each other in that way. Like if we're trying to get neighbors on a big outbreaking route, Parker Washington is
20:38a credible clearout guy in that way.
20:40That sounds like disrespectful of me to say about Parker Washington, but I don't mean that in that way. I mean, he's a
20:45credible threat on downfield routes, which allows me to get even more from my number one receiver. So again, to me, you're kind of thinking about uh and by
20:55the way, like this is going to inform our second question. Whenever I'm thinking about my number two receiver, I want them to really be someone that can
21:03maximize the number one. And it just kind of depends on that player skill set. So to me, I think if we're just
21:10talking about like I have an elite one, which is what neighbors can be and a rare guy that's in tier two of my
21:15dynasty rankings that I think could push into that like true first tier. So that's why I went with him. I'm gonna
21:21want someone like T. Higgins and Parker Washington to not just be really good players in their own right as an outside
21:27and a slot receiver, but someone who can help maximize my number one. All right, I I mentioned the next question here was
21:33going to kind of tie into this. Uh Shawn Donahghue asks, "I'm thinking about your conversation with Robert May about wide receiver room construction. What is Matt
21:40Harmon's ideal number two pass catcher in a 2026 offense?" So yeah, just did a um really good episode with Robert May
21:49on the Athletic Football Show talking about the ideal wide receiver room construction in the modern NFL and if we kind of need to get rid of the whole
21:55like build a wide receiver room like a basketball team idea kind of talked a little bit about in that last question
22:01skewing that idea in a way. Um, all that being said, I think if you're just giving me like I have no context of who
22:08the quarterback is, I have no context of the offensive ecosystem and like I'm just talking about who's my number two.
22:12I think I've kind of settled on like a Z receiver with some size who can be moved around. You know, Michael Pitman's like
22:18one of these guys, right? Um, I think this player can end up being your number one, but the reason I really like a
22:27player like this is because they can credibly play on ball. T. Higgins obviously is more of the exceiver type, but you know that Michael Pitman style
22:35receiver who's going to be a big-time Z receiver, give you some size, give you some easy throws over the middle of the
22:41field because of the size and the zone coverage beating ability as that Z receiver, but you can also play him on
22:46ball and move around your number one.
22:48Like to me, again, the number two receiver has to be someone who can help maximize your number one at this stage.
22:54So, I kind of like that arc type if you're just giving me no other context here on the whole situation. Okay,
22:59number seven. Next question comes in from Dankness. I've had this one on deck. There have been some reports signals that the Chiefs wide receivers
23:07are going to actually get real coaching for the first time this year between Venemy running a tight ship and Chad O'Shea actually being competent plus
23:14having a good track record. Obviously, it's possible worthy or someone else takes a jump. But like who has the most room to grow and the best path to
23:22production with actual time on task? Is it too late for Rice to get better verse man? Too late for Worthy to improve
23:28verse press? If those guys can't, does it bode well for Cyrus Allen or Taekquin Thornton? Well, yeah. I mean, you guys
23:34know I'm a huge Cyrus Allen uh is a great sleeper guy, you know? Okay. I I really like Cyrus Allen. One of my
23:41favorite deep sleepers right now. I think I actually believe he is the in my dynasty rankings player I'm most ahead of market on. Uh what could go wrong? A
23:48sub6 foot, sub 200 pound, you know, kind of slotbased player. Matt Harmon fell for it again. People are saying it's possible.
23:56But anyways, besides that, yeah, and it does I think it bodess well for Cyrus Allen getting on the field because he
24:01can actually beat man coverage. Taekquon Thornton flashed a little bit too. So, I do think it bodess well for those guys.
24:06My my kind of only push back to this question here is that I think we kind of overrate how much like coaches help players improve.
24:17I do think like the longer I'm doing this and obviously like good schemers can put players in positions to succeed and accentuate strengths and hide
24:28weaknesses, but I don't know how often like coaches take weaknesses and make them strengths, especially during training camp and the season. Like most
24:38of this stuff is they're they're installing the scheme. They're preparing certainly during the season they're preparing these guys for the week. Now,
24:46there's definitely some light like position coaches I do think can matter for sure. Um, the enemy running a tight ship, maybe that helps with just like
24:54discipline. I I I don't know. But I think it's mostly up to the players in the off season to put in the work and
25:01then bring that into camp and then hone and sharpen those skills. So, really, I think it's more up to the players and
25:07less up to the coaches on this one.
25:09That's why it's like a player makes a big jump. I'm gonna give credit to the player because it was probably probably and I'm talking about in
25:17isolation, not statistically. It was probably them in the offseason grinding and putting that work in, you know. So, they deserve I think the bulk of the
25:25credit on that one. So, we'll see about this Chiefs wide receiver room. I don't think it's too late for Rice to get
25:29better verse man. Uh I don't Worthy is tough just from a physical perspective, but I I think that yeah, it's not too
25:37It's not too late for Rice. I just worry that like he had such a chaotic off season. I'm not sure. Um I'm not sure if
25:43we're going to see that improvement this year. I I'll kind of believe it when I see it, I guess, is the way I'd go with
25:47it. All right, next one from Adam. How do you expect the Packers wide receiver alignment rotation to look assuming it's Matthew Golden, Jaden Reed, and
25:54Christian Watson? I do think it's going to be those top three guys. I don't think we'll see much rotation with like
25:59Savon Williams, Sky Moore of these guys.
26:01My guess is Reed takes the most snaps in the slot, Watson takes the most snap at X, and Golden takes the most snaps as the Z
26:11receiver. Like that's probably the the right roles. That being said, I think Reed can play outside in in as a Z receiver. I think he can actually play
26:21a little bit of X because he's got some decent, you know, work off press coverage there. So, I think I think he
26:27can do that. The real interesting thing is like the balance between X and Z when it comes to Christian Watson and Matthew
26:33Golden. I just wrote up reception perception profile. And he was someone that I think his skills are best suited to being not exclusively but a little
26:44bit more of an offball receiver than you expect, especially with how good he is on these big breaking routes and how
26:50often they use him on these big breaking routes. Like if we're look if we're running this route tree and he's the ex
26:56receiver, we're getting into like sacrificial exceiver territory.
27:00Watson, and shout out to Jacob Gibbs from Beyond the Box score for putting me onto this stat. Watson is actually more
27:06productive on a per route basis and much more heavily targeted on a per route basis when Romeo Dobs was on the field
27:11than when he was off the field last year. And I think like sometimes that's correlation isn't causation, it's coincidence, whatever. I actually think
27:18there's something instructive there because Watson again is best when he's moved around to exploit matchups and Dobs was the outside on ball the
27:27exceiver. So I actually think because Golden who had kind of like a middling rookie charting profile overall did actually have his best success rate
27:38against press coverage and and is like more of a vertical receiver. I actually would like to see him take some X
27:43receiver work to keep Watson, you know, his role a little more fluid.
27:48Ultimately, I think all three of these guys will even if they have kind of an XZ slot, I I'd like to see them all
27:54continue to move around and get reps from different positions and I think that will happen as Laflur usually has runs a pretty dynamic offense from
28:02preset motion, you know, receiver alignment, that whole deal. So, I have some pretty good faith that that will happen. Next one coming up here is Dante
28:1014. Now that we're getting close to reddraft fantasy football, I'm trying to figure out if there's any late round value from the Dolphins wide receiver
28:16group of Malik Washington, Jaylen Tolbert, and 22 Atwell. M Miami will most likely be in negative game script similar to the Cardinals last year and
28:23could have a surprise high target earnner in their group. How do you see those three playing in that offense?
28:27Here's the deal, man, and I don't mean to be like totally dismissive, but like from a reddraft fantasy football perspective, there is zero reason to
28:33take like a J probably any of these guys, but like Jaylen Tolbert, 22 Atwell, we know what those guys are in
28:39the NFL. I I don't think I I'm I'd be I mean Tolbra is a guy that's like been interesting at times, but I would be
28:47shocked if he turns into like a a true difference maker. You know, Malik Washington is interesting to me. Um I'm just not sure if I've seen enough
28:56evidence yet in the NFL that he can be like a full field outside receiver. I do think he is a good player and a useful
29:02player, but I'm just not 100% sure that he's like a true outside guy. To me, the the real answer here is the rookies, you
29:09know, whether it's Caleb Douglas, who you I thought had some intriguing marks in his profile or Chris Bell as like a
29:16late season stash, like Bell is the guy here from a talent perspective who clears all these players and even if he
29:24wasn't, you know, perfect from a charting perspective, he could beat man press coverage and he could win down the field. I don't see
29:33another receiver who does any of that consistently on this roster. And I just think about like the offensive probably running there with a lot of breaking
29:39routes, yards out for catch opportunities, play action, get the football out in space. I mean, Chris Bell fits really well into a situation like that. So, he
29:48is definitely the guy of all these that I think is the only one that I could see turning into something that's even close to an every
29:56fantasy starter. But, I would guess there's probably no every fantasy starter here. And this offense is pretty clunky. And again, Chris Bell, I don't
30:04even know what he's going to play this year. I don't even know probably going to get any practice time. And I hate
30:09when receivers don't have any practice time in the offseason. So, uh, he's the only one I think has that path to me.
30:15Maybe I'm being too dismissive here, Dante, and and you're right to be a little more intrigued. But, um, reddraft fantasy football, like best baseball,
30:22sure, you could take some of these guys, but like reddraft fantasy football, I I don't see anyone here that's uh screaming out to needs to be picked.
30:28Like that. That's just where I'm at right now. All right, let's get a couple of schematic shift questions in here.
30:34And these are kind of kind of going going to kind of go together. Uh Rohan M asks, "Do you think the 1213 personnel
30:42meta sticks around this year? If not, which situations and there like which situation shifts might enable receivers to get back to larger roles?"
30:51Personally, I think it might be more of a fad than a trend. I'm going to loop that in with the second question here
30:56from uh I know this is perfect shot spelled backwards after I screwed this up once before. Make a prediction on what is the next big schematic change
31:06for the NFL. So to kind of just answer these both as one, I don't know that I would call it a fad,
31:13the 12 13 personnel meta, but I do think there's a chance we're like overstating and overrating like the big picture impacts of all of it. And I say that as
31:21somebody that's talked about it a lot this offseason. Again, I feel like it comes up every single mailbag question, which may be my point that we're
31:27overstating it, even though I'm contributing to the discourse here. So, I I I don't think it's going to just I I
31:34think it objectively sticks around this year. Like, teams try to do it. They said that they were going to do it in
31:39the offseason with their actions, especially with what we saw in the NFL draft, but like how many plays all of these guys end up getting like
31:48these inline tight ends and whatever, like the multiple personnel packages from a tight end standpoint, I do think that's like TBD. And you know, Shawn
31:58McVey did it last year. I I kind of wonder if again what the next trend is going to be because usually it's better
32:04to find the next trend than to chase the the previous trend if that makes sense.
32:08And I I think from the 12 and 13 personnel perspective thing like teams might try it doesn't work then they try
32:14something else. And I also think that you'd be surprised at how willing a team would be to take a third round tight end
32:24and that guy to play like 20% of the snaps. I think they'd be fine with that if he's good in that role and helps them
32:31activate and be like more multiple, but that's not like the world that they're living in. Like I don't think teams are
32:36going to live out of 12 and I don't think any team is going to live out of 13 personnel this year. I just think
32:40they want their 13 personnel looks to be good. I don't think many teams are going to live out of out of 12 personnel this
32:47year. Some might be really high and like overindex on it, but nobody's going to like live in that. So, I don't know if
32:53that makes me agree with you that it's like more of a fad than a trend. I think it might be overtalked about in the
32:57media just because we're going to talk about why these plays are are good and efficient, why teams are, you know, uh
33:05why they're going to be trying to get big explosive plays out of these personal groupings and marry the run of the pass and the whole deal. And I think
33:10that is all really smart, but we might be overstating the impact from like a production standpoint on some of these plays. So my my thought on like the next
33:17thing that's coming, I think the next thing is that's coming and this will like kind of allow receivers to get back
33:23on track. a team I'm watching with this like is the Panthers. So, I'm going to use them as an example to kind of talk
33:28about what I think might be next, which is receivers with size that can mimic some of the tight end stuff and allow
33:36you to be really condensed and run. I mean, this is kind of again what the Rams were doing a few years ago with
33:41like 11 and a half personnel, quote unquote, where they'd get like a big power slot receiver and a big power Z
33:47receiver and those guys like Puka or Cooper Cup or whatever could block it up in the run game. Like that's and you
33:55could still be vertical and explosive out of that stuff because the receivers are going to be more vertical and explosive than the tight ends. So, I
34:02think that like but then also those guys are so good. It allows you to spread teams out as they've gotten bigger and
34:08heavier and tried to stop the run and all these things and attacking concepts at all three levels of the field with
34:14these receivers with some size who can actually separate. And I bring up the Panthers because they've definitely got a one and two in uh Tedo McMillan and
34:21Jaylen Coker that can do it. And Chris Brazzle I think could be that like sacrificial player who also can make some big explosive plays down the field
34:28if he hits. I think he's going to take some time to develop, but if he hits, he could be that guy. And that allows you
34:34to get, again, more spread out. It takes the right type of quarterback to do that. It takes a play caller that's
34:41willing to kind of let go and let God with some of these quarterbacks to do that when we've got like kind of a
34:46league full of, and they're really good at this, so I'm not saying this, you know, disparagingly, but real control freaks at play caller right now. But I
34:55kind of think that's the next trend, which is how do we replicate 12 and 13 personnel with some of these bigger body receivers, but can actually
35:04still separate and like win one-on-one matchups when we want to get high tempo and, you know, kind of force the issue
35:13and push the pace part of it. I think that's going to be really interesting and that's something I've got my eye on
35:19as the next trend. All right, let's get into a section of questions that are heatchecking reception perception favorite players. And I love this, by
35:27the way. Okay, I I I love this because, you know, it's fun. Okay, it's fun to kind of ask myself if I could be wrong
35:34about some of these players. So, this one it kind of fits into that bucket.
35:38Uh, this one's from Crimson in Crimson Shin.
35:44What do you think is Roma Dun's ceiling?
35:46I feel like everyone is hyped on Luther Burton being Aman Ross St. Brown. But who is Rome's high-end comp? I mean,
35:51here's the deal. Like, I think the St.
35:53Brown comparison for Luther Burton is not very good. Uh, cuz I don't think Luther Burton plays like Aman Ross St.
35:59Brown. And I think it's just not like there's like not similar players to me.
36:03Like Burton is more of some kind of combination, and I talked about this on the Athletic Football Show with Robert, who's a Bears fan, some kind of like
36:10combination of Z Flowers and Rasheed Rice, which sounds like a pretty cool player by the way. Uh, our player comparison tool has him as like a Robert
36:17Woods comp, which I think is more about like his role in the offense than it is like skill setwise. But he also draws
36:24like Steph Diggs, Chris Godwin. Like you could tell me he's a combination of like Chris Godwin and Steph Diggs. I think
36:29Luther Burton's much more like peak peak peak would be like Brandon Aayuk or maybe DJ Moore who obviously he's replacing this year. Spoiler alert, he's
36:37not going to play in Aman Ross St.
36:38Brown's role. He's Luther Burn's going to play in DJ Moore's role. Okay, he's gonna be playing the DJ Moore role in
36:43the offense that we just watched last year.
36:46Now, Luther Burton, that's him. Roma Dunay's high-end comp. I mean, the thing with the Dunay is like his comps are big
36:54boy ex receivers, right? I'm talking about like his high-end comp, like if he really hits. Um, and and he's somebody that would be able to play not just X
37:04receiver. Those are some of the best receivers in football. like guys who win against man in press coverage at rates like him but also don't just play X.
37:12Those are some of the top receivers in the NFL which is why I have you know been really in on Roman Dun as a player
37:19because I think he's shown the ability to do that. So I think that it really kind of depends from an archetype
37:25standpoint what you're looking for. I don't want to say like his high-end comp is like Dvonte Adams but you know that
37:31is the type of like route running ability he has. And I mean his player comps coming off of um this 2025 season.
37:38I mean look like these are guys that didn't quite hit that potential, right?
37:43Like Dantavian Wixs, obviously Calvin Ridley, you know, Garrett Wilson, but like he's bigger than these guys, right?
37:48He's bigger than some of these players.
37:50He's more athletic in my opinion than like a Calvin Ridley certainly. So yeah, I mean obviously Drake London, Julio Jones, he gets some moderate comps to
37:59those guys. Brandon Aayuk who we mentioned like big real deal ex receivers who could actually get open.
38:03Malik Neighbors as well. Um yeah those are the type of guys I think again the high-end [snorts] outcome if he really
38:10hits the player he could be that's he would fit more on that end where he is right now he's like the incomplete
38:17version of that the good but the incomplete version of that. We got to be more consistent the catch point. some zone cover stuff could be tightened up,
38:25but he's like right there ready to break through to kind of that tier of player.
38:29So, really excited about Rome and I do love his high-end comparisons. Uh like if he reaches his ceiling, that's a pretty pretty enticing player and one
38:37you build the whole offense out of. Uh as I mentioned, all right, next one comes in from we uh W Ethan Wethan, I
38:46don't know. Are you nervous/hesitant at all on your projections for Josh DS this year based on the sign and the signing
38:53and the trade of Michael Pitman? I really really want to believe this is the year, but the fact he couldn't get
38:58on the field last year over Pitman worries me. Obviously, he is a different type of receiver than Pitman. You kind of answered your question right there.
39:04But if we use Pitman's new average salary from the new contract he just signed, we can sort of estimate that the
39:10NFL market thinks he is about as talented valuable as Wandel Robinson, Romeo Dobs, or Jacobe Meyers. I understand there's some nuance to the
39:17contract situations and wide receiver position, but I'd be a bit concerned if Josh Downs couldn't beat out Wel Robinson, Romeo Dobs, Jacobe Myers.
39:25Basically, it seems like the NFL market is telling us that Robinson, Dobs, Meyers equals Pitman is greater than DS.
39:30Maybe my logic is stupid/ flawed. Or maybe the NFL market is flawed. Or maybe Robinson, Dos, Meyers are super underrated. I kind of think both here. I
39:39don't think your logic is stupid, but I do think using the contract values is a little bit flawed on this one,
39:44especially because Pitman is older than guys like Dobs or Robinson who are entering into their second contracts.
39:52Now, I do think you could compare him to Jacobe Meyers and Meyers basically saved the Jacksonville Jaguars season last year. Michael Pitman was one of the most
40:00productive receivers in the NFL to start last year. Like, not beating out Michael Pitman is a perfectly fine thing for Josh DS. Um, and also Josh Downs was
40:09hurt at the beginning of last year because then that's a problem. That's honestly the biggest problem for DS is that he can never sustain momentum
40:14because he gets hurt. And that's was the issue last year in addition to the fact that he just couldn't get on the field
40:20because they were going to these heavier formations. They were playing in a lot of positive game scripts where they're running the football out. Uh, so yeah,
40:26that's part of it too. But I think the thing for downs and like look what are my projections going to be? I'm going to
40:32try to be realistic and I'm going to try to not be nervous, but like hesitate a little bit when we're talking about like
40:37ranking Josh Downs for fantasy or something like that. But I think the reality is like he will get on the field
40:43this year. There's there's just no doubt about that. We can sit here and talk about two receiver sets and yada yada
40:48yada. But like Shane Styen is not an idiot. Okay? Shane Styen is not going to not play Josh DS in favor of like Nick
40:56Westbrook Aton Doulan or like the second tight end. It's not going to happen. it he would be a bozo to do that. He's not
41:03a bozo. He's actually a really great coach in my opinion. So, the fact that I I don't I'm not too bothered by the fact
41:08that he couldn't, you know, beat out Pitman. Like, he wasn't competing with Pitman. They weren't really playing the same position in the offense last year.
41:14The offense is going to look different this year. Uh overall, this is where again I I don't love the contract usage
41:21as like ranking players or anything because it doesn't take into account like context of like Meyers and Pitman I would say are better players in their
41:29peaks, but they're no longer probably in their peaks whereas like you're probably hoping to pay for potential at least a little growth with Robinson and Dos. And
41:37by the way, sometimes these teams just hand out bad contracts. So, I don't know that that's like the best way to to rank
41:42players, but I'm Yeah, to answer the beginning of the question. Nervous? No.
41:47Hesitant? Like, yeah, I don't want to go all in because it's a little bit of an unknown, but still, no, I feel pretty
41:52good about Josh Downs having a a breakout season this year. And like, by the way, they're going to need him. Alec
41:57Pierce banged up, so they're going to need him. Okay, question from Alex on this one. Talent-wise, Nico Collins seems to be undeniably one of the top
42:06receivers in the NFL. From a fantasy manager's perspective though, he's been a bit frustrating slash unreliable. What makes you think this year will be any
42:12different? Well, great great question. Will this year be any different? Well, maybe it won't be. He might still be a little
42:23bit frustrating, but I think the potential is there for him to really get into a different spot. Um, so I think
42:30the couple things to consider here is that I think he could play maybe some he could move be moved around the formation
42:38more. I think Straoud I do think Strad could be better this year and like he was a top 10 quarterback by EPA per
42:44play. Um, so there's that. But the reality is like yeah, Nico on a base case scenario is probably a guy that is a back half
42:54wide receiver one and is a little frustrating. Guess what? every receiver is a little frustrating and inconsistent. Um, I don't know about
43:01unreliable.
43:02I mean, yeah, he's going to have some down games. Everybody's going to have some down games, but as long as you can
43:09live with that, yeah, that's a guy that's a back half wide receiver one, which is where I'm going to rank him.
43:14But I really like taking him this year because I think there are plenty of paths for him to be even better this
43:20year from a fantasy standpoint. What if he plays fewer snaps at X? What if CJ Strad is a little bit steadier this
43:29year? What if the offense is better under Nick Kaylee? What if the offensive line is better? What if he gets fewer
43:35snaps at X because Jaden Higgins is a little bit better and ready to take on more work in year two? Higgins, I do
43:41think should be a primary Z, but I think take like 20% of his snaps at X, which allow Nico to maybe move around more.
43:48Okay, a lot of paths forward I think for Nico to kind of stabilize that production.
43:54And if he doesn't, well, we already kind of know what he is. He's a spike week wide receiver one who finishes the year
44:00as a wide receiver one. But yes, some weeks you're like, yeah, there's up and down stuff there. But again, that's every wide receiver in fantasy outside
44:07of like two guys. Everybody's going to have some volatility. That's something that I think we just got to accept about this position. And I kind of wish we
44:14would as a fantasy industry because just is what it is for all these guys. All right, one more section here. RP dork
44:21questions. All right, and I say this lovingly, by the way, because I love the RP dorks. These are like some process
44:26questions, bigger picture questions.
44:28These ones are fun. Okay, this one comes in from Daryl G. What are the reasons to consider a player slot only?
44:33Historically, it was just size, but I feel like we're evolving that to mean ability to be pressed and win contested catches with an emphasis on the run
44:39game. I would almost expect smaller man beaters to move outside and bigbodied bullies to slide inside. But while there are outliers, the status quo remains.
44:49Yeah, I mean it's kind of a case- byase basis on this one because every team is going to feel differently about it. I
44:56generally think when I when I personally think of a slot only player, I think of a guy like Hunter Renfro who um was a
45:03small player and also couldn't really beat man coverage. Like I know you're going to show me the three sick routes he ran in like 2019 or whatever, but
45:13like on a consistent basis, not a guy that was threatening vertically. Not a guy that was winning against man coverage.
45:20Not a guy that uh really activates your route concepts from the perimeter. Teams aren't threatened of Hunter Renfro on the perimeter. So, I think that's kind
45:29of what I would say. Like that is a slot only player. But I do agree with your point that like I'm actually kind of
45:36curious about the smaller man coverage receivers on the perimeter like a Josh Downs. In a hypothetical world, last year Josh DS is an outside receiver.
45:44Michael Pitman is a big slot. I think that still activates you in the run game and gives you some explosive plays on
45:49the boundary. So, I do think we're kind of changing a little bit here, but in general, you're right, the status quo
45:56remains. I think we will see some differences this year with how certain teams are able to activate the slot only types, the downses and the
46:05reads from two receiver sets. And that's a trend I'm going to watch this year for sure. Okay, Savix asks, "What is the
46:12process that you use to select which eight games are included in the RP sample? Always been curious what the process is to decide which games are
46:20included or not, as I would think that selection bias could alter the reception perception, i.e. selecting the top eight producing games or the worst eight
46:28producing games. Would love some insight into the process." Yeah, I mean, listen, you're 100% right that only selecting the best eight games or the worst eight
46:36games would be stupid. It's why I don't do that. Uh, I look to get a mix of unproductive and productive games. I
46:44look to get a mix of games that are home, games versus away or games away.
46:50Um, so yeah, like if a guy has a 150 two touchdown game, I'm charting that one in the sample. I want to see what happened
46:57in that one. If a guy has, you know, two catches for 18 yards, that one's going to be in the sample. I want to know what
47:03happened in that game. And that obviously implies that it's a player who has that type of wide variance in their production. It has even the potential to
47:12have big games like that, which not everybody does. Usually there's like just a natural kind of average and all of that. And it's a little more
47:19overstated on on that side of it. But yeah, I want to get a mix of productive, unproductive games. Honestly, it doesn't move the sample one way or
47:28another for the most part. Like a one catch game or something. Sometimes, yeah, the guy got smoked and it does bring the numbers down a little bit.
47:35Sometimes it's just like [ __ ] happens, man. That and and they ended up with one catch and it wasn't that bad of a game
47:41and it doesn't change the sample one way or another. Honestly, that's like the point of reception perception is is isolating the player from outcomes. So,
47:48yeah, I think that actually to me it had I haven't noticed a lot of evidence that it changes the sample one way or
47:54another. Uh some of these like outlier production games. So again, mix of outlier, mix of production, uh mix of home and away, you know, if there is
48:03like a major injury variable, uh like I want to get some games on either on either side of it, right? Um you know,
48:10like a doomsday this year, I think it was like a fiveame split before the foot and then three games after the foot. You
48:16know, you want to get some of that uh in there. I I try to avoid like if you can when you know a guy is playing like a
48:23full half of the season with injury. I'd like to not get a ton of injury tainted gamble g injured injury tainted games in
48:30the sample, but it's just something to remember there. Uh, so yeah, that's and also just um I I'd prefer when possible
48:38not to like double up on this Bears receiver played the Packers two times, but sometimes that's unavoidable because of just like if they miss time with
48:46injuries and that's all they played, you want to get the eight games in. That's important. But yeah, the biggest thing to me is mixing up the production. You
48:53know that because I agree with you like it would be kind of silly to just look at the guys eight best game from a
48:58production standpoint. So, you got to get the mix of that in there and at all points of the season when possible when
49:05they've played a full season. Like, let's get a chunk of games at the beginning, a chunk of games in the middle, and a chunk of games at the end.
49:11So, um it's definitely not random. It's a pretty intentional process that goes into looking at all of those games. And, uh last thing, too, is just, you know,
49:19defensive quality as well. Uh when possible, getting like, oh yeah, they played the Chargers secondary, which I think is just so good against zone
49:27coverage. have such a high opinion of what Jesse Mitchell was doing last year.
49:30We're going to look at that Chargers game. Oh, they played the Broncos.
49:33Really good man cover. Like, let's get a look at that one, you know? Okay, they also played the Dallas Cowboys. [snorts]
49:37Let's not get overindex on that one because they were, you know, an atrocious zone coverage defense. So, you want to get a mix of that stuff to give
49:43a fair view of the player, what they do in easy matchups, hard matchups, and the whole deal. And sometimes, like I said,
49:49guy goes against the Broncos defense, maybe didn't have the production, but he was really good running his routes against that man coverage defense.
49:55That's why it's so important to mix up the process on that one. All right, last one of this section is Ethan
50:00Connley/Osscarcer Bobo asks, "What is something you wish we as RP subscribers would focus more on? Not necessarily a sight feature, but an aspect of wide
50:10receiver play that we underemphasize." I also want to group this question with this one because I it kind of goes into
50:17my answer. Max's 2385 asks what are a lot there are a lot of success metrics on the site success
50:28against a given coverage i.e zone press, you know, success on a given route. What is the hierarchy of the most critical
50:34valuable of these metrics specifically as it correlates to fantasy points? And are there any you view as interrelated success rate versus zone plus success
50:41rate on inbreaker strongest correlation to fantasy points? Yeah, here's here's kind of the thing I think like is this sort of my answer of like what I
50:49want you guys to focus on and not focus on. Um, I'm not trying to like game the system here to correlate to fantasy points,
50:57okay? Like the whole point of reception perception is to f isolate players from surrounding variables. Well, yeah, if we're
51:08isolating them from surrounding variables, like the we're it's not going to correlate clearly to production. Like that's the whole point of the the entire
51:15methodology. Um, so I don't want now obviously from I have done the the studies on this and like it's not a
51:23there's no correlation at all. there is, you know, some correlation to fantasy points. Uh, I'm not trying to come up with the most predictive to next year's
51:31fantasy. Honestly, I think the fantasy industry as a whole overindexes on that.
51:35We know that the most um things like the thing that correlates to next year's fantasy points is last year's fantasy points per game, I believe. Anyways,
51:45like we know that, we have that already, but it's not a 100% correlation.
51:49Otherwise, what are we doing all these podcasts for? What are we doing all this stuff? We're trying to spot outliers.
51:54We're trying to spot areas where that improvement can be made. Like that's the biggest thing to me from like the the
52:00correlating to fantasy points thing. And this also like gets into another part of my answer here, and I'm not picking on
52:06you, Max, because this is a really good question.
52:09But when I'm looking at these metrics, the other thing I would say too is that unlike other like an efficiency stat like a first downs per out run,
52:19which by the way I think is a fantastic and really good stat where like you're comparing receiver to receiver, receiver to receiver, receiver, receiver receiver
52:27with reception perception, these individual metrics, and this is something I I wish subscribers would focus more on, like focus on the
52:35individual player. I I just a point on this, right? Like the profile for Nico Collins and the profile for Aman Ross
52:43St. Brown are very very different because they play very different positions. So I don't want to sit here and say well St. Brown is better in this
52:51metric and Nico is better in this metric so therefore one is better than the other. Like every player's individual profile should be taken within the
52:57context of just that player. So yes, we have sortable data on the site. What I don't want you to do is like go to
53:03success rate versus man, sort by most or like sort by best to worst and then yeah, plug that into fantasy rankings.
53:09Obviously, that's that's not what I'm trying to do here. We're trying to isolate the player from surrounding variables. We're trying to understand
53:14that like the player best what they're doing in isolation so that yeah, obviously if if variables change for a player, you know, they can have that
53:24breakout season. If the film is really good and the production is not there, why is that? And can that change? That's
53:32why, you know, listen, would it would my life be a lot easier if I didn't write uh all these profiles? Totally. But
53:40that's why I write all them because the context matters so much. And I never want to just like lay out a bunch of
53:46stats and like have you react to that. I want to actually explain what's going on here. And I think that's the thing I
53:52hope people focus the most on is like the why and the process and what happens there as opposed to like trying to
53:58predict outcomes necessarily. Of course, we're doing we're doing fantasy content on the site. I have dynasty rankings on the site, [sighs and gasps] but it's a
54:06piece of the puzzle. Your favorite creator and and their stats. It's a piece of the puzzle. Okay? Hopefully, you like me and you like my stuff.
54:14That's why you're watching this video.
54:14That's why you're here this deep into the video watching the RP Dort questions. Okay?
54:20So, if you like that, I'm a piece of the puzzle. Other people are a piece of the puzzle. Put it all together. Try to get
54:27this stuff right. So, um, I don't know if I totally answered that, like what I want you guys to focus on. I would love,
54:32by the way, what site features do you want to see from a wide receiver standpoint? Let me know in the comments.
54:36Hit me up in Discord. Would love to know. Um, but yeah, underemphasize is just like I don't know. I think you guys
54:43are pretty sharp, honestly. I think you you're like the best audience in the NFL or the fantasy space, honestly. So, I
54:49think you guys are doing great.
54:52Focus on the individual players, man.
54:53That's what I'm doing here. Okay. non- football questions here before we get it before we get out of here. All right,
54:58this one comes in from Sleeves. Who's your favorite character in the Red Rising series? Uh, must be a Football 301 listener because I believe that's
55:05the only place I've talked about what books I'm reading right now. Yeah, I'm still uh working through the Red Rising series. Uh, they are here's my kind of
55:13reading habits for the people out there.
55:14This is definitely what everyone cares about is um in the morning I listen to audiobooks while I'm on my walk, post
55:23breakfast walk. I try to walk a mile, excuse me, I try to walk an hour every day. Usually that's about three miles uh
55:30every morning when it's raining outside.
55:32Then I do I do watch TV on the treadmill. So yeah, that's where I got my that's really the only time I watch
55:38TV series is when I'm walking in the morning watching the Diplomat, by the way, on Netflix right now. when I do
55:44that or when I'm flying. Although my last plane ride, I wrote all these profiles that are on the site as of
55:49Monday morning. So, wasn't watching a lot of u the diplomat there. I'm behind.
55:54I need some more rain, I guess. But anyways, I listen to audiobooks there and then I read uh usually like memoirs
56:01or like books at night actually in bed before I go to sleep. No more screen time before bed for me. But uh to the
56:09question because I am listening to Red Rising right now. Uh, just to put some context here, I am halfway through book
56:15two. So, um, you don't know what's going to happen to a lot of these characters.
56:22Please do not spoil it for me. Uh, hard to not like Sevro right now. Okay.
56:26Really good character. I think there's going to based on where I'm at in book two and some things happening. I think there's going to be a
56:33lot of depth and intrigue with the character going forward. And I also thought he's uh you know kind of one of
56:38the most compelling and like likable not likable type characters of the uh of the book so far. So I would say Seo has been
56:47certainly right now based on again what just happened.
56:50One of the more interesting characters, one of the more um you know unpredictable characters I would say. So Seo is my guy right now. All right. Uh
56:57last one here for the video and this section. Earball asks, "It's 2027 and football along with all other team sports are ruled illegal. What does Matt
57:06Harmon do for a career?"
57:09I don't know why I wanted to put this one in the video because honestly, this gives me a lot of dread. Um, I really
57:15don't know. I'll tell you what, like you didn't even need to say all the other team sports part. I don't want I I'm
57:21maybe I would get into baseball or basketball if there was no more football, but right now I don't watch other sports.
57:28I I'm I'm all football all the time. So, you know, that wasn't an option for me to become a, you know, MLB podcaster or
57:37something like that. Um, that would be kind of shocking. What do I do for a career?
57:44Yeah, I guess I would love, honestly, if I was to be if I was to be fully honest with with you, I would hope to get into
57:50like some other type of content uh creation, some other type of, you know, like podcasting. I I would talk about something else on a podcast. I maybe I'd
57:58get back to like my sociology roots, which is what I I studied in school. I wanted to get the PhD in that uh before
58:05the football thing football football thing worked out. So, thank God. Uh but yeah, maybe I'd get back into that and you know, maybe get it maybe podcast
58:12about that. That would probably go nowhere and uh my career and life would sink. So, you know, yeah, I would give
58:18that a shot. And if that didn't work out, honestly, I have no idea. I was working in social work before this. I
58:24could get back into that for a career.
58:27But honestly, I wanted to end on this question. Now I remember this. I wanted to end on this question just for uh you
58:33know, again, thank you guys for allowing me to do this. [laughter] I probably I've rambled for God knows how long on
58:39this mailbag video and uh the fact that I get to do this and talk about football with you guys and you subscribe to the
58:45channel, which I hope you do. You subscribe to the website receptionperception.com, which I hope you do, and you're a member of the RP
58:51Discord. Links on all that below. allows me to uh talk about football and wide receiver nerd stuff, you know, here, which is honestly like the greatest gift
59:01of my life. Uh I I'm feeling very refreshed and jacked up about this football season and just more like grateful than ever. So the fact that
59:10earball I don't really have to consider your question outside of a hypothetical and like you know yeah my my my sociology podcast you know my cultural
59:18podcast that I would host in this really dark fantasy world fantasy ironic this dark fictional world I'm glad I don't have not to consider
59:29that because you guys give me a platform to do this instead. So appreciate you guys here a ton of great questions for
59:35the July mailbag. Remember, if you join the RP Discord, you can drop them in pretty much anytime. I consider them for
59:41any new upcoming mailbag. In the meantime, again, thank you all for joining. Thank you for watching.
59:47Subscribe to the channel. Subscribe to receptionception.com. We have a ton of profiles coming out in August, all throughout the month leading up to week
59:54one. Until then, I'll catch you guys in the next video.