Levitan prefers WRs over Montgomery at pick 50; lacks creation ability.
David MontgomeryRB
Adam Levitan rates Montgomery around 50 overall and does not find him exciting; he does not create much on his own and Levitan prefers wide receivers in that range (Luther Burden, McLaurin, Devontae Adams, Jamison Williams, Mike Evans) on DraftKings. Levitan's broader point is that Montgomery and Marks should not be moving based on coach quotes about backfield usage, as such reports often lack specificity about actual snap/carry splits.
View David Montgomery 2026 fantasy football value pagePlayer profile with fantasy value, ADP, projections, news, and source-backed STACKED insightsSource transcript excerpt
He does not create much on his own. I think he's okay around 50 overall. Not exciting. I prefer to be taking wide receivers in this range, really, especially on DraftKings.
Common questions
David Montgomery fantasy football FAQ
- What did Establish The Run say about David Montgomery?
- Adam Levitan rates Montgomery around 50 overall and does not find him exciting; he does not create much on his own and Levitan prefers wide receivers in that range (Luther Burden, McLaurin, Devontae Adams, Jamison Williams, Mike Evans) on DraftKings. Levitan's broader point is that Montgomery and Marks should not be moving based on coach quotes about backfield usage, as such reports often lack specificity about actual snap/carry splits.
- Is this good or bad for David Montgomery's fantasy football value?
- STACKED tags this as a negative fantasy football signal for David Montgomery (RB). Levitan prefers WRs over Montgomery at pick 50; lacks creation ability.
- Where can I see David Montgomery's full 2026 fantasy outlook, projections, and ADP?
- David Montgomery's complete 2026 fantasy football outlook — projections, ADP movement across every platform, injury context, and all source-backed STACKED insights — is on their STACKED player profile.
Related signal