Andrews is a risky bet despite potential YAC regression due to poor efficiency metrics.
Mark AndrewsTEBAL
JJ Zachariason highlights Andrews as a risky bet due to a career-worst 1.23 yards per route run and a career-low 8.0-yard average depth of target in 2025. While historical data suggests his yards after catch (YAC) rate will likely improve from his sub-3.0 mark, similar tight ends historically failed to see a significant boost in fantasy production.
Captured by STACKED 2 hr after posting
View Mark Andrews 2026 fantasy football value pagePlayer profile with fantasy value, ADP, projections, news, and source-backed STACKED insightsSource transcript excerpt
Andrews isn't necessarily a total fade. He's just a sincerely risky bet, even with favorable yak regression coming.
Common questions
Mark Andrews fantasy football FAQ
- What did The Late-Round Fantasy Football Podcast say about Mark Andrews?
- JJ Zachariason highlights Andrews as a risky bet due to a career-worst 1.23 yards per route run and a career-low 8.0-yard average depth of target in 2025. While historical data suggests his yards after catch (YAC) rate will likely improve from his sub-3.0 mark, similar tight ends historically failed to see a significant boost in fantasy production.
- Is this good or bad for Mark Andrews's fantasy football value?
- STACKED tags this as a positive fantasy football signal for Mark Andrews (TE BAL). Andrews is a risky bet despite potential YAC regression due to poor efficiency metrics.
- Where can I see Mark Andrews's full 2026 fantasy outlook, projections, and ADP?
- Mark Andrews's complete 2026 fantasy football outlook — projections, ADP movement across every platform, injury context, and all source-backed STACKED insights — is on their STACKED player profile.
Related signal